Evidence map›Paper›PMID 16282779›Full record

ReviewCurrent opinion in pediatrics2005

Progress toward discerning the genetics of cleft lip.

Andrew C Lidral, Lina M Moreno

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Current opinion in pediatrics, 2005. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 46 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
46citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

46 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. [Cleft lip and palate].Der Pathologe · 2017
    Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Racial Variations in Velopharyngeal and Craniometric Morphology in Children: An Imaging Study.Journal of speech, language, and hearing research : JSLHR · 2016
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Long-term effects of oral clefts on health care utilization: a sibling comparison.The European journal of health economics : HEPAC : health economics in prevention and care · 2015
    Article
  13. GFA Taq I polymorphism and cleft lip with or without cleft palate (CL/P) risk.International journal of clinical and experimental medicine · 2015
    Article
  14. Developmental profiles of the murine palatal methylome.Birth defects research. Part A, Clinical and molecular teratology · 2013
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Genetics of nonsyndromic orofacial clefts.The Cleft palate-craniofacial journal : official publication of the American Cleft Palate-Craniofacial Association · 2012
    Review
  19. A comprehensive review of the genetic basis of cleft lip and palate.Journal of oral and maxillofacial pathology : JOMFP · 2012
    Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Andrew C LidralDepartment of Orthodontics, University of Iowa, Iowa City, Iowa 52242, USA. Andrew-Lidral@uiowa.edu
Lina M Moreno

Funding

PHENOTYPE AND GENETICS IN OROFACIAL CLEFT FAMILIESP50DE016215 · NIDCR · UNIVERSITY OF IOWA · PI SCHUTTE, BRIAN C · 2004 to 2008
$10.1M
Cleft Lip Genetics: A Multi Center International ConsortiumR01DE014667 · NIDCR · UNIVERSITY OF IOWA · PI LIDRAL, ANDREW C · 2001 to 2009
$4.2M
International Maternal &Child Health Research/TrainingD43TW005503 · FIC · UNIVERSITY OF IOWA · PI MURRAY, JEFFREY C · 2001 to 2005
$915k
Cleft Lip Genetics: Multicenter International ConsortiumK02DE015291 · NIDCR · UNIVERSITY OF IOWA · PI LIDRAL, ANDREW C · 2003 to 2007
$514k
FIC NIH HHS 1D43 TW-05503FIC NIH HHS D43 TW005503NIDCR NIH HHS K02 DE015291NIDCR NIH HHS KO2DE015291NIDCR NIH HHS P50 DE016215NIDCR NIH HHS P50DE016215NIDCR NIH HHS R01 DE014667NIDCR NIH HHS R01DE14677
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purpose of reviewOrofacial clefts are common birth defects with a known genetic component to their etiology. Most orofacial clefts are nonsyndromic, isolated defects, which can be separated into two different phenotypes: (1) cleft lip with or without cleft palate and (2) cleft palate only. Both are genetically complex traits, which has limited the ability to identify disease loci or genes. The purpose of this review is to summarize recent progress of human genetic studies in identifying causal genes for isolated or nonsyndromic cleft lip with or without cleft palate. RECENT

findingsThe results of multiple genome scans and a subsequent meta-analysis have significantly advanced our knowledge by revealing novel loci. Furthermore, candidate gene approaches have identified important roles for IRF6 and MSX1. To date, causal mutations with a known functional effect have not yet been described. SUMMARY: With the implementation of genome-wide association studies and inexpensive sequencing, future studies will identify disease genes and characterize both gene-environment and gene-gene interactions to provide knowledge for risk counseling and the development of preventive therapies.

Indexed as

B-Cell Lymphoma 3 ProteinChildCleft LipCleft PalateGenetic Predisposition to DiseaseHumansInterferon Regulatory FactorsMSX1 Transcription FactorProto-Oncogene ProteinsTranscription FactorsTransforming Growth Factor betaTransforming Growth Factor beta3B-Cell Lymphoma 3 ProteinBCL3 protein, humanInterferon Regulatory FactorsIRF6 protein, humanMSX1 protein, humanMSX1 Transcription FactorProto-Oncogene ProteinsTranscription FactorsTransforming Growth Factor betaTransforming Growth Factor beta3

Identifiers

PMID16282779
PMCPMC2752353

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.