Evidence map›Paper›PMID 16282005›Full record

SynthesisThe British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners2005

Educational and organisational interventions used to improve the management of hypertension in primary care: a systematic review.

Tom Fahey, Knut Schroeder, Shah Ebrahim

Abstract readMeta-AnalysisSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners, 2005. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 38 papers, 7 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
38citing papers in PubMed, 7 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

38 citing papers in PubMed, 7 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Self-monitoring and other non-pharmacological interventions to improve the management of hypertension in primary care: a systematic review.The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners · 2010
    Pooled it
  7. Quality-improvement strategies for the management of hypertension in chronic kidney disease in primary care: a systematic review.The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners · 2010
    Pooled it
  8. Trial
  9. Trial
  10. Hypertension Education, Provider, and Cardio-Cerebrovascular Symptom Awareness: 2024 Korea Community Health Survey.High blood pressure & cardiovascular prevention : the official journal of the Italian Society of Hypertension · 2026
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Tom FaheyUniversity of Dundee, Scotland. t.p.fahey@chs.dundee.ac.uk
Knut Schroeder
Shah Ebrahim

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe optimal way in which to organise and deliver care to patients with hypertension has not been clearly identified.

aimTo determine the effectiveness of educational and organisational strategies used to improve control of blood pressure. DESIGN OF STUDY: Systematic review of randomised controlled trials (RCTs).

methodQuantitative pooling of RCT data on patients with hypertension that evaluated the following interventions: (1) self monitoring, (2) educational interventions directed to the patient, (3) educational interventions directed to the health professional, (4) health professional (nurse or pharmacist) led care, (5) organizational interventions that aimed to improve the delivery of care, (6) appointment reminder systems.

resultsFifty-six RCTs met our inclusion criteria. The methodological quality of included studies was variable. An organised system of regular review allied to vigorous antihypertensive drug therapy was shown to reduce blood pressure (weighted mean difference -8.2/-4.2mmHg, -11.7/-6.5mmHg, -10.6/-7.6mmHg for three strata of entry blood pressure) and all-cause mortality at 5 years follow-up (6.4% versus 7.8%, difference 1.4%) in a single large RCT (the Hypertension Detection and Follow-up study). Other interventions had variable effects. Self-monitoring was associated with moderate net reduction in diastolic blood pressure, weighted mean difference (WMD): -2.03 mmHg, 95% confidence interval (CI) = -2.7 to -1.4 mmHg. Educational interventions directed towards physicians were associated with small reductions in systolic blood pressure (WMD) -2.0mmHg, 95% CI = -3.5 to -0.6mmHg and diastolic blood pressure (WMD) -0.4mmHg, 95% CI -1.1 to 0.3mmHg.

conclusionsGeneral practices and community-based clinics need to have an organised system of regular follow-up and review of their hypertensive patients. Antihypertensive drug therapy should be implemented by means of a vigorous stepped care approach when patients do not reach target blood pressure levels. These findings have important implications for recommendations concerning implementation of structured delivery of care in hypertension guidelines.

Indexed as

Patient Education as TopicAdultAntihypertensive AgentsDelivery of Health CareFamily PracticeHumansHypertensionProgram EvaluationPsychiatric Status Rating ScalesQuality of Health CareAntihypertensive Agents

Identifiers

PMID16282005
PMCPMC1570766

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.