Evidence map›Paper›PMID 16282000›Full record

Trial reportThe British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners2005

Deciding who gets treatment for depression and anxiety: a study of consecutive GP attenders.

Julia Hyde, Jonathan Evans, Debbie Sharp, Tim Croudace, Glynn Harrison, Glyn Lewis, Ricardo Araya

Abstract readMulticenter StudyRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners, 2005. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed
5.6field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 39 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Managing depression in primary care: it's not only what you do it's the way that you do it.The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners · 2009
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Mental health diagnosis by nurses using the Global Mental Health Assessment Tool: a validity and feasibility study.The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners · 2008
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Julia HydeKing's College London Institute of Psychiatry, Health Psychology Section, Kings College London.
Jonathan Evans
Debbie Sharp
Tim Croudace
Glynn Harrison
Glyn Lewis
Ricardo Araya
King's College London · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundMost research has focused on recognition by GPs of the common mental disorders: depression and anxiety. However, less is known about the factors that determine whether patients with those disorders that are recognised receive any active treatment.

aimTo investigate factors associated with receiving active treatment among consecutive attenders identified by GPs as having a common mental disorder.

settingData were collected as part of a cluster randomised controlled trial in 30 general practices in the south of Bristol, UK, on the impact of mental health guidelines in primary care.

methodWe studied 439 consecutive general practice attenders aged 16-64 years who were given a diagnosis of depression, anxiety, or chronic mixed anxiety and depression by their GP. The main outcome measure was the provision of any active treatment, whether pharmacological or psychological, for these disorders. Patient, GP, and practice level data, including sociodemographic, clinical, and administrative data were explored as predictors in a logistic regression model. Huber White variance estimates were used to account for hierarchical clustering.

resultsOf those patients identified as having a common mental disorder by the GP, 54% were offered active treatment. Higher symptom score, as measured by the General Health Questionnaire (GHQ) (odds ratio [OR] = 1.09; 95% confidence interval [CI] = 1.06 to 1.13; P<0.001) and being male (OR = 1.54; 95% CI = 1.13 to 2.09; P = 0.006), were both associated with an increased likelihood of being offered active treatment. Patients with anxiety (OR = 0.24; 95% = CI 0.14 to 0.41; P<0.001), or chronic mixed anxiety/depression (OR = 0.41; 95% CI = 0.23 to 0.73; P = 0.003) were less likely to be offered active treatment than those considered to have depression.

conclusionWhen deciding to offer active treatment for common mental disorders, GPs appear to be influenced by the severity of symptoms rather than their 'understandability' in relation to recent life stresses or the social context of distress. Further research is needed to investigate why men are more likely and those with an anxiety disorder less likely, to be offered active treatment.

Indexed as

Attitude of Health PersonnelAdolescentAdultAgedAnxiety DisordersDecision MakingDepressive DisorderFamily PracticeFemaleHealth Services Needs and DemandHumansMaleMiddle AgedPractice Guidelines as TopicPractice Patterns, Physicians'Severity of Illness Index

Identifiers

PMID16282000
PMCPMC1570785
OpenAlexW1882738052

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.