Evidence map›Paper›PMID 16277736›Full record

ReviewCritical care (London, England)2005

Clinical review: respiratory mechanics in spontaneous and assisted ventilation.

Daniel C Grinnan, Jonathon Dean Truwit

Registry-linked trialAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Critical care (London, England), 2005. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT03802383 (A Study on the Relationship Between the Trans-diaphragmatic Pressure and the Contraction of the Diaphragm), which is not on this map. Cited by 47 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
47citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT03802383 unknown statusnot on this mapstarted 2018, after this paper: background citation

A Study on the Relationship Between the Trans-diaphragmatic Pressure and the Contraction of the Diaphragm

TypeobservationalSponsorUniversity of ThessalyRan2018 to 2024Enrolled30ConditionsWeaning Failure, Respiratory Paralysis, Respiratory Failure
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

47 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Pathophysiology and Prevention of Manual-Ventilation-Induced Lung Injury (MVILI).Pathophysiology : the official journal of the International Society for Pathophysiology · 2024
    Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. The (human) respiratory rate at rest.Journal of mathematical biology · 2022
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Daniel C GrinnanDepartment of Pulmonary and Critical Care, University of Virginia Health System, Virginia, USA. dg6j@virginia.edu
Jonathon Dean Truwit

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Pulmonary disease changes the physiology of the lungs, which manifests as changes in respiratory mechanics. Therefore, measurement of respiratory mechanics allows a clinician to monitor closely the course of pulmonary disease. Here we review the principles of respiratory mechanics and their clinical applications. These principles include compliance, elastance, resistance, impedance, flow, and work of breathing. We discuss these principles in normal conditions and in disease states. As the severity of pulmonary disease increases, mechanical ventilation can become necessary. We discuss the use of pressure-volume curves in assisting with poorly compliant lungs while on mechanical ventilation. In addition, we discuss physiologic parameters that assist with ventilator weaning as the disease process abates.

Indexed as

Airway ResistanceExhalationHumansInhalationLung ComplianceRespiration, ArtificialRespiratory Distress SyndromeRespiratory MechanicsVentilator WeaningWork of Breathing

Identifiers

PMID16277736
PMCPMC1297597

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.