Evidence map›Paper›PMID 16277137›Full record

Trial reportEating and weight disorders : EWD2005

Binge eating disorder in obesity: comparison of different therapeutic strategies.

E Molinari, M Baruffi, M Croci, S Marchi, M L Petroni

Abstract readComparative StudyRandomized Controlled Trial
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Trial report in Eating and weight disorders : EWD, 2005. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.8field-weighted citation impact, top 15% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 22 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

E MolinariLaboratorio Sperimentale di Ricerche Psicologiche, Milano, Italy. molinari@auxologico.it
M Baruffi
M Croci
S Marchi
M L Petroni
IRCCS Istituto Auxologico Italiano · ITUniversità Cattolica del Sacro Cuore · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The aim of this study (duration: 12 months) was to compare different integrated therapeutic approaches for the therapy of Binge Eating Disorder (BED). A sample of 65 female severely obese BED was randomly divided into 3 groups: the first one was treated by Cognitive-Behavioural Therapy (CBT) alone; the second one was treated by SSRI antidepressant therapy (fluoxetine) alone; the remaining was treated by a combination of CBT plus fluoxetine. All groups received group nutritional training and individual dietary counselling. The initial fluoxetine dose (20 mg/day) was adjusted (up to 60 mg/day) according to frequency of binge eating. During the first 4 weeks, all subjects underwent an in-patient dietary treatment aimed to achieve at least a 5% weight loss, which was continued during the out-patient treatment phase. At the beginning and at the end of the therapy the patients were evaluated by the Minnesota Multiphasic Personality - 2 and by the Eating Disorder Inventory - 2. The results showed that the two groups which underwent psychotherapy resulted in a better outcome - in terms of number of bingeing episodes, maintenance of weight loss reduction from baseline and psychological well being - than the group treated with pharmacological therapy alone. Finally, the study underlines the importance of a multidisciplinary approach to the treatment of Binge Eating Disorder.

Indexed as

AdultAgedBody Mass IndexBulimia NervosaCognitive Behavioral TherapyCohort StudiesCombined Modality TherapyCross-Sectional StudiesFluoxetineHumansMiddle AgedObesitySelective Serotonin Reuptake InhibitorsFluoxetineSelective Serotonin Reuptake Inhibitors

Identifiers

PMID16277137
OpenAlexW1992534133

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.