Evidence map›Paper›PMID 16275479›Full record

ArticleBiomedicine & pharmacotherapy = Biomedecine & pharmacotherapie2005

Circadian and extracircadian exploration during daytime hours of circulating corticosterone and other endocrine chronomes.

R Jozsa, A Olah, G Cornélissen, V Csernus, K Otsuka, M Zeman, G Nagy, J Kaszaki, K Stebelova, N Csokas and 4 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Biomedicine & pharmacotherapy = Biomedecine & pharmacotherapie, 2005. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Intensity ofBulletin of experimental biology and medicine · 2023
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Cycles in epilepsy.Nature reviews. Neurology · 2021
    Review
  8. Seizure Cycles in Focal Epilepsy.JAMA neurology · 2021
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors.

R JozsaDepartment of Anatomy (MTA-TKI), University Pecs, Medical School, Pecs, Hungary.
A Olah
G Cornélissen
V Csernus
K Otsuka
M Zeman
G Nagy
J Kaszaki
K Stebelova
N Csokas
W Pan
M Herold
E E Bakken
F Halberg

Funding

TIMING OF PHYSIOLOGIC FUNCTIONS IN HEALTH AND DISEASEK06GM013981 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA TWIN CITIES · PI HALBERG, FRANZ · 1985 to 2012
$424k
NIGMS NIH HHS K06 GM013981
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

During 7 consecutive days, blood and several tissues were collected during daytime working hours only, three times per day at 4-h intervals from inbred Wistar rats, which had been previously standardized for 1 month in two rooms on a regimen of 12 h of light (L) alternating with 12 h of darkness (LD12:12). In one room, lights were on from 09:00 to 21:00 and in the other room, lights were on from 21:00 to 09:00 (DL12:12; reversed lighting regimen). This setup provides a convenient design to study circadian and extracircadian variations over long (e.g., 7-day) spans. Prior checking of certain circadian rhythms in animals reared in the room on reversed lighting (DL) as compared with animals in the usual (LD) regimen provided evidence that the 180 degrees phase-shift had occurred. These measurements were limited to the circadian (and not extended to infradian) variation. As marker rhythm, the core temperature of a subsample of rats was measured every 4 h around the clock (by night as well as by day) before the start of the 7-day sampling. An antiphase of the circadian rhythm in core temperature was thus demonstrated between rats in the LD vs. DL rooms. A sex difference in core temperature was also found in each room. A reversed rhythm in animals kept in DL and an antiphase between rats kept in DL vs. LD was again shown for the circulating corticosterone rhythm documented in subsamples of 8 animals of each sex sampled around the clock during the first approximately 1.5 day of the 7-day sampling. The findings were in keeping with the proposition that sampling rats at three timepoints 4 h apart during daytime from two rooms on opposite lighting regimens allows the assessment of circadian changes, the daytime samples from animals kept on the reversed lighting regimen accounting for the samples that would have to be obtained by night from animals kept in the room with the usual lighting regimen. During the 7-day-long follow-up, circadian and extracircadian spectral components were mapped for serum corticosterone, taking into account the large day-to-day variability. A third check on the synchronization of the animals to their respective lighting regimen was a comparison (and a good agreement) between studies carried out earlier on the same variables and the circadian results obtained on core temperature and serum corticosterone in this study as a whole. The present study happened to start on the day of the second extremum of a moderate double magnetic storm. The study of any associations of corticosterone with the storm is beyond our scope herein, as are the results on circulating prolactin, characterized by a greater variability and a larger sex difference than corticosterone. Sex differences and extracircadian aspects of prolactin and endothelin determined in the same samples are reported elsewhere, as are results on melatonin. Prior studies on melatonin were confirmed insofar as a circadian profile is concerned by sampling on two antiphasic lighting regimens, as also reported elsewhere. Accordingly, a circadian map for the rat will eventually be extended by the result of this study and aligned with other maps with the qualification of the unassessed contribution in this study of a magnetic storm.

Indexed as

Chronobiology PhenomenaAnimalsBody TemperatureBody WeightCircadian RhythmCorticosteroneElectromagnetic FieldsEndocrine GlandsFemaleHormonesLightingLinear ModelsMaleMelatoninNonlinear DynamicsProlactinCorticosteroneHormonesMelatoninProlactin

Identifiers

PMID16275479
PMCPMC2576471

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.