Evidence map›Paper›PMID 16274481›Full record

ArticleBMC family practice2005

Reasons for and consequences of missed appointments in general practice in the UK: questionnaire survey and prospective review of medical records.

Richard D Neal, Mahvash Hussain-Gambles, Victoria L Allgar, Debbie A Lawlor, Owen Dempsey

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC family practice, 2005. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 78 papers, 5 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
78citing papers in PubMed, 5 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

78 citing papers in PubMed, 5 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Which patients miss appointments with general practice and the reasons why: a systematic review.The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners · 2021
    Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Mobile phone messaging reminders for attendance at healthcare appointments.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2013
    Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Trial
  7. Trial
  8. Trial
  9. Barriers to using text message appointment reminders in an HIV clinic.Telemedicine journal and e-health : the official journal of the American Telemedicine Association · 2014
    Trial
  10. Trial
  11. Text messaging reminders to reduce non-attendance in chronic disease follow-up: a clinical trial.The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners · 2009
    Trial
  12. Trial
  13. Observational
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. On Missed Appointments: The Ethics of Nonattendance in General Practice.Journal of evaluation in clinical practice · 2025
    Article
  19. Article
  20. Review

18 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Richard D NealNorth Wales Clinical School, Department of General Practice, University of Cardiff, Wrexham Technology Park, Wrexham LL13 7YP, UK. nealrd@cf.ac.uk
Mahvash Hussain-Gambles
Victoria L Allgar
Debbie A Lawlor
Owen Dempsey

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundMissed appointments are a common occurrence in primary care in the UK, yet little is known about the reasons for them, or the consequences of missing an appointment. This paper aims to determine the reasons for missed appointments and whether patients who miss an appointment subsequently consult their general practitioner (GP). Secondary aims are to compare psychological morbidity, and the previous appointments with GPs between subjects and a comparison group.

methodsPostal questionnaire survey and prospective medical notes review of adult patients missing an appointment and the comparison group who attended appointments over a three week period in seven general practices in West Yorkshire.

resultsOf the 386 who missed appointments 122 (32%) responded. Of the 386 in the comparison group 223 (58%) responded, resulting in 23 case-control matched pairs with complete data collection. Over 40% of individuals who missed an appointment and participated said that they forgot the appointment and a quarter said that they tried very hard to cancel the appointment or that it was at an inconvenient time. A fifth reported family commitments or being too ill to attend. Over 90% of the patients who missed an appointment subsequently consulted within three months and of these nearly 60% consulted for the stated problem that was going to be presented in the missed consultation. The odds of missing an appointment decreased with increasing age and were greater among those who had missed at least one appointment in the previous 12 months. However, estimates for comparisons between those who missed appointments and the comparison group were imprecise due to the low response rate.

conclusionPatients who miss appointments tend to cite practice factors and their own forgetfulness as the main reasons for doing so, and most attend within three months of a missed appointment. This study highlights a number of implications for future research. More work needs to be done to engage people who miss appointments into research in a meaningful way.

Indexed as

Appointments and SchedulesAge DistributionCase-Control StudiesEnglandFamily PracticeFemaleFocus GroupsHumansMaleMedical RecordsMental RecallMotivationPatient DropoutsPhysician-Patient RelationsSex DistributionSurveys and Questionnaires

Identifiers

PMID16274481
PMCPMC1291364

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.