ArticleClinical cardiology2005
One-stop cardiovascular diagnostic imaging (and radiation dose).
Article in Clinical cardiology, 2005. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 7 citations in OpenAlex.
- Cardiovascular studies and the radiation dose.Clinical cardiology · 2009Article
- The continuing value of invasive coronary angiography.Clinical cardiology · 2008Article
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Kefer et al. indicate that "MSCT and MR are useful for the noninvasive detection of coronary artery stenoses on both a segmental and per vessel basis. Because neither technique is 100% accurate, these techniques are not ready yet to replace conventional coronary angiography." In summary, all things considered, a properly done cardiac catheterization with contrast angiography can really be a one-stop shop for diagnostic imaging and therapy of the cardiovascular system, and the radiation dose is acceptable.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.