ArticleJournal of clinical microbiology2005
Campylobacter coli in swine production: antimicrobial resistance mechanisms and molecular epidemiology.
Article in Journal of clinical microbiology, 2005. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
18 citing papers in PubMed, 66 citations in OpenAlex.
- Impact of In-Feed versus In-Water Chlortetracycline and Tiamulin Administrations on Fecal Prevalence and Antimicrobial Susceptibilities ofMicroorganisms · 2023Article
- Antimicrobial Resistance Profiles and Macrolide Resistance Mechanisms ofMicroorganisms · 2021Article
- Effect of Supplementing Seaweed Extracts to Pigs until d35 Post-Weaning on Performance and Aspects of Intestinal Health.Marine drugs · 2021Article
- Campylobacter sp.: Pathogenicity factors and prevention methods-new molecular targets for innovative antivirulence drugs?Applied microbiology and biotechnology · 2020Review
- Campylobacter jejuni and Campylobacter coli autotransporter genes exhibit lineage-associated distribution and decay.BMC genomics · 2020Article
- Genome Comparison of Erythromycin ResistantFrontiers in microbiology · 2017Article
- Complete Genome Sequence and Annotation of a Campylobacter jejuni Strain, MTVDSCj20, Isolated from a Naturally Colonized Farm-Raised Chicken.Genome announcements · 2014Article
- Foodborne Campylobacter: infections, metabolism, pathogenesis and reservoirs.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2013Review
- Widespread acquisition of antimicrobial resistance among Campylobacter isolates from UK retail poultry and evidence for clonal expansion of resistant lineages.BMC microbiology · 2013Article
- Article
- Genotypic-phenotypic discrepancies between antibiotic resistance characteristics of Escherichia coli isolates from calves in management settings with high and low antibiotic use.Applied and environmental microbiology · 2011Article
- Evolution of an agriculture-associated disease causing Campylobacter coli clade: evidence from national surveillance data in Scotland.PloS one · 2010Article
- Host association of Campylobacter genotypes transcends geographic variation.Applied and environmental microbiology · 2010Article
- Scientific Opinion on Quantification of the risk posed by broiler meat to human campylobacteriosis in the EU.EFSA journal. European Food Safety Authority · 2010Article
- Campylobacter genotypes from food animals, environmental sources and clinical disease in Scotland 2005/6.International journal of food microbiology · 2009Article
- Campylobacter genotyping to determine the source of human infection.Clinical infectious diseases : an official publication of the Infectious Diseases Society of America · 2009Article
- Tracing the source of campylobacteriosis.PLoS genetics · 2008Article
- Species identification of Campylobacter jejuni ssp. jejuni and C. coli by matrix-assisted laser desorption/ionization time-of-flight mass spectrometry and PCR.Folia microbiologica · 2008Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The aim of this study was to determine antimicrobial resistance, to evaluate and compare the use of two genotyping methods for molecular epidemiology purposes, and to determine the genotypic diversity of Campylobacter coli of porcine origin. A total of 100 C. coli isolates from swine were tested for susceptibility to six antimicrobials using the agar dilution method and genotyped using two high-resolution fingerprinting approaches: multilocus sequence typing (MLST) and pulsed-field gel electrophoresis (PFGE). Evaluation of the methods was based on their resistance patterns, discriminatory indexes (DI), high test throughputs, costs, and turnaround times. Resistance to erythromycin and tetracycline was the most common. Both genotypic methods were found to have high discriminatory power, although MLST had a higher DI (0.936) than PFGE (DI = 0.889). It also had a higher throughput than PFGE. Isolates were clustered into 27 groups by MLST compared to 11 by PFGE. MLST was able to further discriminate the isolates grouped under the same cluster by PFGE. Out of the 65 MLST sequence types (STs) identified among the total isolates, 50 were reported for the first time. Most STs were found to be specific to the farm (n = 38) and to slaughter (n = 22). Resistance against tetracycline and erythromycin was encoded by the tet(O) gene and a A2075G point mutation in the 23S rRNA gene, respectively. A high ciprofloxacin MIC (>64 microg/liter) was conferred by a point mutation in the gyrA gene. The weak clonal structure of the C. coli population among swine was further highlighted by the index of association value of 0.293. The findings of this study indicate that multidrug-resistant diverse C. coli strains exhibiting resistance to ciprofloxacin and erythromycin are concerning, since these are the drugs of choice for treating invasive campylobacteriosis cases in humans.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.