Evidence map›Paper›PMID 16272508›Full record

ArticleJournal of clinical microbiology2005

Campylobacter coli in swine production: antimicrobial resistance mechanisms and molecular epidemiology.

Siddhartha Thakur, Wondwossen A Gebreyes

Open access · greenAbstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of clinical microbiology, 2005. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed
6.4field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed, 66 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Genome Comparison of Erythromycin ResistantFrontiers in microbiology · 2017
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Foodborne Campylobacter: infections, metabolism, pathogenesis and reservoirs.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2013
    Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Campylobacter genotyping to determine the source of human infection.Clinical infectious diseases : an official publication of the Infectious Diseases Society of America · 2009
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Siddhartha ThakurDepartment of Population Health and Pathobiology, College of Veterinary Medicine, North Carolina State University, 4700 Hillsborough St., Raleigh, NC 27606, USA.
Wondwossen A Gebreyes
North Carolina State University · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The aim of this study was to determine antimicrobial resistance, to evaluate and compare the use of two genotyping methods for molecular epidemiology purposes, and to determine the genotypic diversity of Campylobacter coli of porcine origin. A total of 100 C. coli isolates from swine were tested for susceptibility to six antimicrobials using the agar dilution method and genotyped using two high-resolution fingerprinting approaches: multilocus sequence typing (MLST) and pulsed-field gel electrophoresis (PFGE). Evaluation of the methods was based on their resistance patterns, discriminatory indexes (DI), high test throughputs, costs, and turnaround times. Resistance to erythromycin and tetracycline was the most common. Both genotypic methods were found to have high discriminatory power, although MLST had a higher DI (0.936) than PFGE (DI = 0.889). It also had a higher throughput than PFGE. Isolates were clustered into 27 groups by MLST compared to 11 by PFGE. MLST was able to further discriminate the isolates grouped under the same cluster by PFGE. Out of the 65 MLST sequence types (STs) identified among the total isolates, 50 were reported for the first time. Most STs were found to be specific to the farm (n = 38) and to slaughter (n = 22). Resistance against tetracycline and erythromycin was encoded by the tet(O) gene and a A2075G point mutation in the 23S rRNA gene, respectively. A high ciprofloxacin MIC (>64 microg/liter) was conferred by a point mutation in the gyrA gene. The weak clonal structure of the C. coli population among swine was further highlighted by the index of association value of 0.293. The findings of this study indicate that multidrug-resistant diverse C. coli strains exhibiting resistance to ciprofloxacin and erythromycin are concerning, since these are the drugs of choice for treating invasive campylobacteriosis cases in humans.

Indexed as

AbattoirsAnimalsAnimals, DomesticAnti-Bacterial AgentsCampylobacter coliCampylobacter InfectionsCiprofloxacinCosts and Cost AnalysisDNA GyraseDrug Resistance, Multiple, ViralElectrophoresis, Gel, Pulsed-FieldErythromycinEvaluation Studies as TopicGenetic VariationMicrobial Sensitivity TestsMutationAnti-Bacterial AgentsCiprofloxacinDNA GyraseErythromycinTetracycline

Identifiers

PMID16272508
PMCPMC1287812
OpenAlexW2156896486

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.