Evidence map›Paper›PMID 16272503›Full record

ArticleJournal of clinical microbiology2005

Direct detection and identification of Mycobacterium tuberculosis and Mycobacterium bovis in bovine samples by a novel nested PCR assay: correlation with conventional techniques.

A Mishra, A Singhal, D S Chauhan, V M Katoch, K Srivastava, S S Thakral, S S Bharadwaj, V Sreenivas, H K Prasad

Open access · greenAbstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of clinical microbiology, 2005. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 41 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
41citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.6field-weighted citation impact, top 19% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

41 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 93 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Frontiers in public health · 2025
    Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. The Indian journal of medical research · 2022
    Review
  12. Aptamer Detection ofFrontiers in cellular and infection microbiology · 2021
    Article
  13. Real-Time PCR Validation forFrontiers in veterinary science · 2021
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Validation of a Real-Time PCR for the Detection ofFrontiers in veterinary science · 2019
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Diagnosis of mycobacteria in bovine milk: an overview.Revista do Instituto de Medicina Tropical de Sao Paulo · 2017
    Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

A MishraDepartment of Biotechnology, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi 110029, India. hk_prasad@hotmail.com
A Singhal
D S Chauhan
V M Katoch
K Srivastava
S S Thakral
S S Bharadwaj
V Sreenivas
H K Prasad
National JALMA Institute for Leprosy & Other Mycobacterial Diseases · INAll India Institute of Medical Sciences · IN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Mycobacterium tuberculosis and M. bovis infect animals and humans. Their epidemiology in developed and developing countries differs, owing to differences in the implementation of preventive measures (World Health Organization, 1999). Identification and differentiation of these closely related mycobacterial species would help to determine the source, reservoirs of infection, and disease burden due to diverse mycobacterial pathogens. The utility of the hupB gene (Rv2986c in M. tuberculosis, or Mb3010c in M. bovis) to differentiate M. tuberculosis and M. bovis was evaluated by a PCR-restriction fragment length polymorphism (RFLP) assay with 56 characterized bovine isolates. The degree of concordance between the PCR-RFLP assay and the microbiological characterization was 99.0% (P < 0.001). A nested PCR (N-PCR) assay was developed, replacing the PCR-RFLP assay for direct detection of M. tuberculosis and M. bovis in bovine samples. The N-PCR products of M. tuberculosis and M. bovis corresponded to 116 and 89 bp, respectively. The detection limit of mycobacterial DNA by N-PCR was 50 fg, equivalent to five tubercle bacilli. M. tuberculosis and/or M. bovis was detected in 55.5% (105/189) of the samples by N-PCR, compared to 9.4% (18/189) by culture. The sensitivities of N-PCR and culture were 97.3 and 29.7, respectively, and their specificities were 22.2 and 77.7%, respectively. The percentages of animals or samples identified as infected with M. tuberculosis or M. bovis by N-PCR and culture reflected the clinical categorizations of the cattle (P of <0.05 to <0.01). Mixed infection by N-PCR was detected in 22 animals, whereas by culture mixed infection was detected in 1 animal.

Indexed as

AnimalsBase SequenceCattleCattle DiseasesDNA PrimersGenes, BacterialMolecular Sequence DataMycobacterium bovisMycobacterium tuberculosisPolymerase Chain ReactionSensitivity and SpecificitySequence AlignmentSpecies SpecificityTuberculosisTuberculosis, BovineDNA Primers

Identifiers

PMID16272503
PMCPMC1287790
OpenAlexW1996631267

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.