Evidence map›Paper›PMID 16272466›Full record

ArticleJournal of clinical microbiology2005

Rapid detection of Mycobacterium tuberculosis in respiratory samples by transcription-reverse transcription concerted reaction with an automated system.

Shunji Takakura, Shigeo Tsuchiya, Yuichi Isawa, Kiyoshi Yasukawa, Toshinori Hayashi, Motohisa Tomita, Katsuhiro Suzuki, Tatsuro Hasegawa, Takanori Tagami, Atsuyuki Kurashima and 1 more

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of clinical microbiology, 2005. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.2field-weighted citation impact, top 12% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 36 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Clinical Features and Prognosis of Nontuberculous Mycobacterial Pleuritis.Respiration; international review of thoracic diseases
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Shunji TakakuraDepartment of Clinical Laboratory Medicine, Kyoto University Graduate School of Medicine, 54 Shogoin-Kawaharacho, Sakyo-ku, Kyoto 6068507, Japan. stakakr@kuhp.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Shigeo Tsuchiya
Yuichi Isawa
Kiyoshi Yasukawa
Toshinori Hayashi
Motohisa Tomita
Katsuhiro Suzuki
Tatsuro Hasegawa
Takanori Tagami
Atsuyuki Kurashima
Satoshi Ichiyama
Tosoh (Japan) · JPTokyo National Hospital · JPKyoto University · JPNational Kinki Chuo Hospital for Chest Disease · JP

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The aim of this study was to evaluate the performance of the transcription-reverse transcription concerted (TRC) method for the detection of Mycobacterium tuberculosis complex (MTC) 16S rRNA in clinical respiratory samples for the diagnosis of pulmonary tuberculosis. TRC is a novel method that enables the rapid and the completely homogeneous real-time monitoring of isothermal sequence RNA amplification without any postamplification procedure. The detection limit of the TRC method for MTC was one organism per 100 mul of sputum. The specificity of the method was confirmed by the absence of positive signals for sputum containing 10(6) M. avium or M. kansasii organisms per 100 microl. A total of 201 respiratory samples from patients diagnosed with or suspected of having tuberculosis were tested. Of the 72 MTC culture-positive samples, the TRC method was positive for 52 (sensitivity, 72.2%), whereas the Roche COBAS AMPLICOR PCR was positive for 58 (sensitivity, 80.6%). Both the TRC method and the COBAS AMPLICOR PCR showed no positive identification for any of the 129 culture-negative samples. The percent agreement between the two methods was 95% (191 of 201 samples). The high sensitivity and specificity together with shorter detection time (within 1 h) of the TRC method allow it to be proposed as a useful method for the rapid detection of MTC in respiratory samples.

Indexed as

Bacteriological TechniquesEvaluation Studies as TopicFluorescenceHumansIntercalating AgentsMycobacterium tuberculosisNucleic Acid Amplification TechniquesRNA, BacterialRNA, Ribosomal, 16SSensitivity and SpecificitySputumTuberculosis, PulmonaryIntercalating AgentsRNA, BacterialRNA, Ribosomal, 16S

Identifiers

PMID16272466
PMCPMC1287819
OpenAlexW2110514616

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.