Evidence map›Paper›PMID 16272416›Full record

ArticleGenetics2006

A logistic regression mixture model for interval mapping of genetic trait loci affecting binary phenotypes.

Weiping Deng, Hanfeng Chen, Zhaohai Li

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Genetics, 2006. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. A maximum likelihood approach to functional mapping of longitudinal binary traits.Statistical applications in genetics and molecular biology · 2012
    Article
  4. Generalized linear model for interval mapping of quantitative trait loci.TAG. Theoretical and applied genetics. Theoretische und angewandte Genetik · 2010
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Weiping DengDepartment of Statistics, George Washington University, Washington, District of Columbia 20052, USA.
Hanfeng Chen
Zhaohai Li

Funding

Statistical Methods for Genetic Study Design &AnalysisR01EY014478 · NEI · GEORGE WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY · PI LI, ZHAOHAI · 2002 to 2005
$701k
NEI NIH HHS EY014478NEI NIH HHS R01 EY014478
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Often in genetic research, presence or absence of a disease is affected by not only the trait locus genotypes but also some covariates. The finite logistic regression mixture models and the methods under the models are developed for detection of a binary trait locus (BTL) through an interval-mapping procedure. The maximum-likelihood estimates (MLEs) of the logistic regression parameters are asymptotically unbiased. The null asymptotic distributions of the likelihood-ratio test (LRT) statistics for detection of a BTL are found to be given by the supremum of a chi2-process. The limiting null distributions are free of the null model parameters and are determined explicitly through only four (backcross case) or nine (intercross case) independent standard normal random variables. Therefore a threshold for detecting a BTL in a flanking marker interval can be approximated easily by using a Monte Carlo method. It is pointed out that use of a threshold incorrectly determined by reading off a chi2-probability table can result in an excessive false BTL detection rate much more severely than many researchers might anticipate. Simulation results show that the BTL detection procedures based on the thresholds determined by the limiting distributions perform quite well when the sample sizes are moderately large.

Indexed as

Chromosome MappingGenetic MarkersLogistic ModelsModels, GeneticModels, StatisticalAlgorithmsChi-Square DistributionComputer SimulationCrosses, GeneticPhenotypeGenetic Markers

Identifiers

PMID16272416
PMCPMC1456231

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.