Evidence map›Paper›PMID 16272239›Full record

ArticlePostgraduate medical journal2005

Endoscopy waiting times and impact of the two week wait scheme on diagnosis and outcome of upper gastrointestinal cancer.

T Spahos, A Hindmarsh, E Cameron, M R Tighe, L Igali, D Pearson, M Rhodes, M P N Lewis

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Postgraduate medical journal, 2005. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. ACG and CAG Clinical Guideline: Management of Dyspepsia.The American journal of gastroenterology · 2017
    Guideline
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Delay in diagnostic workup and treatment of esophageal cancer.Journal of gastrointestinal surgery : official journal of the Society for Surgery of the Alimentary Tract · 2010
    Article
  12. Prospective evaluation of a novel one-stop testicular clinic.Annals of the Royal College of Surgeons of England · 2008
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

T SpahosDivision of Upper Gastrointestinal Surgery, Department of General Surgery, Norfolk and Norwich University Hospital NHS Trust, Norwich, UK. theospahos@hotmail.com
A Hindmarsh
E Cameron
M R Tighe
L Igali
D Pearson
M Rhodes
M P N Lewis

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The NHS has introduced the two week wait scheme to detect upper gastrointestinal cancers at an early stage and improve survival rates The aim of this study was to assess the impact of this scheme and changes in endoscopy waiting times on tumour stage and resection rates over a four year period. Data were analysed prospectively for all patients diagnosed with oesophagogastric cancer between September 1998 and September 2002 and from those referred under the two week wait scheme since its introduction in 2000. Of those tumours diagnosed by this scheme (15%) only 5% were early disease (stage 1 or 2). Patients with early cancer, mainly diagnosed by routine gastroscopy, do not present with symptoms meeting the two week wait criteria. An increase in the resection rates for early disease will most probably be seen with a reduction in routine endoscopy waiting times.

Indexed as

Waiting ListsAmbulatory CareEarly DiagnosisEndoscopy, GastrointestinalEnglandEsophageal NeoplasmsHumansPrognosisProspective StudiesReferral and ConsultationStomach NeoplasmsTime Factors

Identifiers

PMID16272239
PMCPMC1743392

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.