Evidence map›Paper›PMID 16270939›Full record

ArticleCough (London, England)2005

Idiopathic chronic cough: a real disease or a failure of diagnosis?

L P A McGarvey

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cough (London, England), 2005. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 31 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
31citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

31 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Honey plus coffee versus systemic steroid in the treatment of persistent post-infectious cough: a randomised controlled trial.Primary care respiratory journal : journal of the General Practice Airways Group · 2013
    Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Herbal MedicineInternational journal of environmental research and public health · 2023
    Article
  9. Observational
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Cough Hypersensitivity Syndrome: A Few More Steps Forward.Allergy, asthma & immunology research · 2017
    Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Chronic cough hypersensitivity syndrome.Cough (London, England) · 2013
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

L P A McGarveyDepartment of Medicine, The Queen's University of Belfast, Grosvenor Road, Belfast BT126BJ, N Ireland, UK. l.mcgarvey@qub.ac.uk

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Despite extensive diagnostic evaluation and numerous treatment trials, a number of patients remain troubled by a chronic and uncontrollable cough. Eosinophilic bronchitis, atopic cough and non-acid reflux have been recently added to the diagnostic spectrum for chronic cough. In some cases, failure to consider these conditions may explain treatment failure. However, a subset of patients with persisting symptoms may be regarded as having an idiopathic cough. These individuals are most commonly female, of postmenopausal age and frequently report viral upper respiratory tract infections as an initiating event. This paper seeks to explore the validity of idiopathic cough as a distinct clinical entity.

Identifiers

PMID16270939
PMCPMC1277011

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.