Evidence map›Paper›PMID 16270212›Full record

ReviewThe European journal of health economics : HEPAC : health economics in prevention and care2005

Defining the "Health Benefit Basket" in nine European countries. Evidence from the European Union Health BASKET Project.

J Schreyögg, T Stargardt, M Velasco-Garrido, R Busse

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in The European journal of health economics : HEPAC : health economics in prevention and care, 2005. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 26 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
26citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

26 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. The impact of periodic updates to health benefits plan: access gains without cost savings?International journal of health economics and management · 2025
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Observational
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Should Countries Set an Explicit Health Benefits Package? The Case of the English National Health Service.Value in health : the journal of the International Society for Pharmacoeconomics and Outcomes Research · 2017
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Analysing coverage decision-making: opening Pandora's box?The European journal of health economics : HEPAC : health economics in prevention and care · 2014
    Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

J SchreyöggDepartment of Health Care Management, Berlin University of Technology, Berlin, Germany. jonas.schreyoegg@tu-berlin.de
T Stargardt
M Velasco-Garrido
R Busse

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This article identifies and analyses a framework for "health baskets," the taxonomy of benefit catalogues for curative services, and the criteria for the in- or exclusion of benefits in nine EU member states (Denmark, England, France, Germany, Hungary, Italy, The Netherlands, Poland and Spain). Focusing on services of curative care, it is found that the explicitness of benefit catalogues varies largely between the countries. In the absence of explicitly defined benefit catalogues, in- and outpatient remuneration schemes have the character of benefit catalogues. The criteria for the in- or exclusion into benefit catalogues are often not transparent and (cost-)effectiveness is applied only for certain sectors. An EU-wide harmonization of benefit baskets does not seem realistic in the short or medium term as the variation in criteria and the taxonomies of benefit catalogues are large but not insurmountable. There may be scope for a European core basket.

Indexed as

Cost-Benefit AnalysisEuropeHealth PolicyHealth PrioritiesHealth ServicesHealth Services AdministrationHealth Services ResearchHumansNational Health ProgramsPatient Care

Identifiers

PMID16270212
PMCPMC1388078

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.