Evidence map›Paper›PMID 16269823›Full record

ArticleNucleic acids research2005

Duplication processes in Saccharomyces cerevisiae haploid strains.

Joseph Schacherer, Jacky de Montigny, Anne Welcker, Jean-Luc Souciet, Serge Potier

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Nucleic acids research, 2005. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Regulation of ribosomal DNA amplification by the TOR pathway.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2015
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Comparative genomics and molecular dynamics of DNA repeats in eukaryotes.Microbiology and molecular biology reviews : MMBR · 2008
    Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Joseph SchachererCNRS/ULP, Laboratoire de Microbiologie et Génétique, Strasbourg, France.
Jacky de Montigny
Anne Welcker
Jean-Luc Souciet
Serge Potier

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Duplication is thought to be one of the main processes providing a substrate on which the effects of evolution are visible. The mechanisms underlying this chromosomal rearrangement were investigated here in the yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Spontaneous revertants containing a duplication event were selected and analyzed. In addition to the single gene duplication described in a previous study, we demonstrated here that direct tandem duplicated regions ranging from 5 to 90 kb in size can also occur spontaneously. To further investigate the mechanisms in the duplication events, we examined whether homologous recombination contributes to these processes. The results obtained show that the mechanisms involved in segmental duplication are RAD52-independent, contrary to those involved in single gene duplication. Moreover, this study shows that the duplication of a given gene can occur in S.cerevisiae haploid strains via at least two ways: single gene or segmental duplication.

Indexed as

Gene DuplicationAspartate CarbamoyltransferaseCarbamoyl-Phosphate Synthase (Glutamine-Hydrolyzing)Chromosomes, FungalGene DeletionGenes, FungalHaploidyMultienzyme ComplexesSaccharomyces cerevisiaeSaccharomyces cerevisiae ProteinsSequence Analysis, DNAAspartate CarbamoyltransferaseCarbamoyl-Phosphate Synthase (Glutamine-Hydrolyzing)Multienzyme ComplexesSaccharomyces cerevisiae ProteinsURA2 protein, S cerevisiae

Identifiers

PMID16269823
PMCPMC1277810

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.