ArticleApplied and environmental microbiology2005
Recognition of individual genes in diverse microorganisms by cycling primed in situ amplification.
Article in Applied and environmental microbiology, 2005. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed, 26 citations in OpenAlex.
- Review
- Quantitative real-time PCR and fluorescence in situ hybridization approaches for enumerating Brevundimonas diminuta in drinking water.Journal of industrial microbiology & biotechnology · 2010Article
- Transfer of a phage T4 gene into Enterobacteriaceae, determined at the single-cell level.Applied and environmental microbiology · 2010Article
- High-frequency phage-mediated gene transfer among Escherichia coli cells, determined at the single-cell level.Applied and environmental microbiology · 2007Article
- Quantitative determination of free-DNA uptake in river bacteria at the single-cell level by in situ rolling-circle amplification.Applied and environmental microbiology · 2006Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Cycling primed in situ amplification-fluorescent in situ hybridization (CPRINS-FISH) was developed to recognize individual genes in a single bacterial cell. In CPRINS, the amplicon was long single-stranded DNA and thus retained within the permeabilized microbial cells. FISH with a multiply labeled fluorescent probe set enabled significant reduction in nonspecific background while maintaining high fluorescence signals of target bacteria. The ampicillin resistance gene in Escherichia coli, chloramphenicol acetyltransferase gene in different gram-negative strains, and RNA polymerase sigma factor (rpoD) gene in Aeromonas spp. could be detected under identical permeabilization conditions. After concentration of environmental freshwater samples onto polycarbonate filters and subsequent coating of filters in gelatin, no decrease in bacterial cell numbers was observed with extensive permeabilization. The detection rates of bacterioplankton in river and pond water samples by CPRINS-FISH with a universal 16S rRNA gene primer and probe set ranged from 65 to 76% of total cell counts (mean, 71%). The concentrations of cells detected by CPRINS-FISH targeting of the rpoD genes of Aeromonas sobria and A. hydrophila in the water samples varied between 2.1 x 10(3) and 9.0 x 10(3) cells ml(-1) and between undetectable and 5.1 x 10(2) cells ml(-1), respectively. These results demonstrate that CPRINS-FISH provides a high sensitivity for microscopic detection of bacteria carrying a specific gene in natural aquatic samples.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.