ArticleApplied and environmental microbiology2005
Molecular epidemiology of antimicrobial-resistant commensal Escherichia coli strains in a cohort of newborn calves.
Article in Applied and environmental microbiology, 2005. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
15 citing papers in PubMed.
- Whole-genome sequencing-based antimicrobial resistance and shedding dynamics ofMicrobiology spectrum · 2024Article
- Genetic Characterization of Antibiotic ResistantFrontiers in microbiology · 2022Article
- Combining epidemiological and ecological methods to quantify social effects onRoyal Society open science · 2021Article
- Occurrence and Spread of Quinolone-Resistant Escherichia coli on Dairy Farms.Applied and environmental microbiology · 2016Article
- Antimicrobial resistance in humans, livestock and the wider environment.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2015Review
- Molecular characterization of multidrug-resistant Escherichia coli isolates from Irish cattle farms.Applied and environmental microbiology · 2011Article
- Distribution and characterization of ampicillin- and tetracycline-resistant Escherichia coli from feedlot cattle fed subtherapeutic antimicrobials.BMC microbiology · 2011Article
- A retrospective diagnostic laboratory survey of antimicrobial resistance in fecal Escherichia coli isolated from spring calves in western Canada.The Canadian veterinary journal = La revue veterinaire canadienne · 2010Article
- Associations between antimicrobial use and the prevalence of antimicrobial resistance in fecal Escherichia coli from feedlot cattle in western Canada.The Canadian veterinary journal = La revue veterinaire canadienne · 2010Article
- Longitudinal characterization of resistant Escherichia coli in fecal deposits from cattle fed subtherapeutic levels of antimicrobials.Applied and environmental microbiology · 2009Article
- Relatedness of Escherichia coli strains with different susceptibility phenotypes isolated from swine feces during ampicillin treatment.Applied and environmental microbiology · 2009Article
- Diversity and distribution of commensal fecal Escherichia coli bacteria in beef cattle administered selected subtherapeutic antimicrobials in a feedlot setting.Applied and environmental microbiology · 2008Article
- Effect of subtherapeutic administration of antibiotics on the prevalence of antibiotic-resistant Escherichia coli bacteria in feedlot cattle.Applied and environmental microbiology · 2008Article
- Antimicrobial resistance in generic fecal Escherichia coil obtained from beef cattle on arrival at the feedlot and prior to slaughter, and associations with volume of total individual cattle antimicrobial treatments in one western Canadian feedlot.Canadian journal of veterinary research = Revue canadienne de recherche veterinaire · 2008Article
- Sources of variation in the ampicillin-resistant Escherichia coli concentration in the feces of organic broiler chickens.Applied and environmental microbiology · 2007Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Pulsed-field gel electrophoresis (PFGE) was used to investigate the dissemination and diversity of ampicillin-resistant (Amp(r)) and nalidixic acid-resistant (Nal(r)) commensal Escherichia coli strains in a cohort of 48 newborn calves. Calves were sampled weekly from birth for up to 21 weeks and a single resistant isolate selected from positive samples for genotyping and further phenotypic characterization. The Amp(r) population showed the greatest diversity, with a total of 56 different genotype patterns identified, of which 5 predominated, while the Nal(r) population appeared to be largely clonal, with over 97% of isolates belonging to just two different PFGE patterns. Distinct temporal trends were identified in the distribution of several Amp(r) genotypes across the cohort, with certain patterns predominating at different points in the study. Cumulative recognition of new Amp(r) genotypes within the cohort was biphasic, with a turning point coinciding with the housing of the cohort midway through the study, suggesting that colonizing strains were from an environmental source on the farm. Multiply resistant isolates dominated the collection, with >95% of isolates showing resistance to at least two additional antimicrobials. Carriage of resistance to streptomycin, sulfamethoxazole, and tetracycline was the most common combination, found across several different genotypes, suggesting the possible spread of a common resistance element across multiple strains. The proportion of Amp(r) isolates carrying sulfamethoxazole resistance increased significantly over the study period (P < 0.05), coinciding with a decline in the most common genotype pattern. These data indicate that calves were colonized by a succession of multiply resistant strains, with a probable environmental source, that disseminated through the cohort over time.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.