Evidence map›Paper›PMID 16269617›Full record

ReviewBlood2006

Survival of the fittest: in vivo selection and stem cell gene therapy.

Tobias Neff, Brian C Beard, Hans-Peter Kiem

Open access · bronzeAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Blood, 2006. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 26 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
26citing papers in PubMed
3.9field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

26 citing papers in PubMed, 63 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. In Vivo HSC Gene Therapy Using a Bi-modular HDAd5/35++ Vector Cures Sickle Cell Disease in a Mouse Model.Molecular therapy : the journal of the American Society of Gene Therapy · 2021
    Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. A CombinedMolecular therapy. Methods & clinical development · 2018
    Article
  8. Gene therapy for hemoglobin disorders - a mini-review.Journal of rare diseases research & treatment · 2016
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Cytogenetic instability of dental pulp stem cell lines.Journal of molecular histology · 2012
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Long-term regulation of genetically modified primary hematopoietic cells in dogs.Molecular therapy : the journal of the American Society of Gene Therapy · 2011
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Tobias NeffClinical Research Division, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, 1100 Fairview Ave N, Seattle, WA 98109, USA.
Brian C Beard
Hans-Peter Kiem
University of Washington · US

Funding

VECTOR CONSTRUCTIONS FOR GENE THERAPY OF SICKLE CELL DISEASEP01HL053750 · NHLBI · UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON · PI RUSSELL, DAVID W · 1994 to 2014
$30.4M
UNRELATED AND HLA-MISMATCHED RELATED DONOR TRANSPLANTSP01HL036444 · NHLBI · FRED HUTCHINSON CANCER RESEARCH CENTER · PI STORER, BARRY E. · 1986 to 2010
$25.9M
CORE--VECTOR PRODUCTIONP30DK056465 · NIDDK · FRED HUTCHINSON CANCER RESEARCH CENTER · PI HEIMFELD, SHELLY · 1999 to 2014
$14.9M
TRANSDUCTION OF BABOON HEMATOPOIETIC STEM CELLSP50HL054881 · NHLBI · FRED HUTCHINSON CANCER RESEARCH CENTER · PI BERNSTEIN, IRWIN · 1995 to 2004
$11.0M
PILOT STUDY--RETROVIRUS MEDIATED TRANSFER OF HUMAN GLUCOCEREBROSIDASE GENEP30DK047754 · NIDDK · UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON · PI MILLER, ARTHUR DUSTY · 1994 to 2008
$8.4M
Suplement to Safety and Efficacy of AIDS Gene Therapy in MonkeysP01AI061839 · NIAID · CITY OF HOPE/BECKMAN RESEARCH INSTITUTE · PI ROSSI, JOHN JOSEPH · 2004 to 2007
$7.1M
MGMT-Mediated in vivo Selection in a Large Animal ModelR01HL074162 · NHLBI · FRED HUTCHINSON CANCER RESEARCH CENTER · PI KIEM, HANS-PETER · 2003 to 2006
$1.7M
NHLBI NIH HHS HL36444NHLBI NIH HHS HL53750NHLBI NIH HHS HL54881NHLBI NIH HHS HL74162NIAID NIH HHS AI061839NIDDK NIH HHS DK47754NIDDK NIH HHS DK56465
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Stem cell gene therapy has long been limited by low gene transfer efficiency to hematopoietic stem cells. Recent years have witnessed clinical success in select diseases such as X-linked severe combined immunodeficiency (SCID) and ADA deficiency. Arguably, the single most important factor responsible for the increased efficacy of these recent protocols is the fact that the genetic correction provided a selective in vivo survival advantage. Since, for most diseases, there will be no selective advantage of gene-corrected cells, there has been a significant effort to arm vectors with a survival advantage. Two-gene vectors can be used to introduce the therapeutic gene and a selectable marker gene. Efficient in vivo selection strategies have been demonstrated in clinically relevant large-animal models. Mutant forms of the DNA repair-enzyme methylguanine methyltransferase in particular have allowed for efficient in vivo selection and have achieved sustained marking with virtually 100% gene-modified cells in large animals, and with clinically acceptable toxicity. Translation of these strategies to the clinical setting is imminent. Here, we review how in vivo selection strategies can be used to make stem cell gene therapy applicable to the treatment of a wider scope of genetic diseases and patients.

Indexed as

Genetic TherapyStem Cell TransplantationAdenosine DeaminaseAnimalsCell SurvivalDNA RepairGenetic MarkersGenetic VectorsGene Transfer TechniquesHumansMutationO(6)-Methylguanine-DNA MethyltransferaseSevere Combined ImmunodeficiencyTransgenesAdenosine DeaminaseGenetic MarkersO(6)-Methylguanine-DNA Methyltransferase

Identifiers

PMID16269617
PMCPMC1895696
OpenAlexW2091600059

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.