Evidence map›Paper›PMID 16267671›Full record

ArticleHuman genetics2006

Ring chromosome 15: characterization by array CGH.

Ian A Glass, Katherine A Rauen, Emily Chen, Jillian Parkes, Donna G Alberston, Daniel Pinkel, Philip D Cotter

Abstract readCase Reports
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Human genetics, 2006. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
1.7field-weighted citation impact, top 16% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 105 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Ring autosomes: some unexpected findings.Balkan journal of medical genetics : BJMG · 2012
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 5 institutions in 2 countries.

Ian A GlassDepartment of Pediatrics, University of Washington, M2-9, 4800 Sand Point Way NE, Seattle, 98105, USA. ianglass@u.washington.edu
Katherine A Rauen
Emily Chen
Jillian Parkes
Donna G Alberston
Daniel Pinkel
Philip D Cotter
University of California, San Francisco · USKaiser Permanente · USKaiser Permanente Oakland Medical Center · USQueensland Health · AUUniversity of Washington · US

Funding

MICROARRAY BASED SCANNING OF THE MOUSE GENOMEU01CA084118 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN FRANCISCO · PI ALBERTSON, DONNA G · 1999 to 2008
$3.9M
GENOME WIDE ANALYSIS OF DNA COPY NUMBER BY ARRAYR01CA083040 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA SAN FRANCISCO · PI PINKEL, DANIEL · 1999 to 2001
$2.0M
Elucidation of the genetic etiology of Costello SyndromeK23HD048502 · NICHD · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN FRANCISCO · PI RAUEN, KATHERINE ANNA · 2005 to 2009
$609k
NCI NIH HHS CA83040NCI NIH HHS CA84118NICHD NIH HHS HD048502
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Ring chromosome 15 [r(15)] is an uncommon finding with less than 50 patients reported. Precise genotype-phenotype correlations are problematic because of the difficulties in determining the extent of euchromatic loss, the level of mosaicism, and the influence of the timing of ascertainment. We report two discordant examples of r(15) patients. In the first case, prenatal diagnosis of a de novo r(15) was made during the second trimester: mos 46,XX,r(15)(p11.2q26)[32]/45,XX,-15[13]/47,XX,r(15)(p11.2q26)x2[3]/46,XX,dic r(15)(p11.2q26p11.2q26[1]/46,XX[2]. Postnatal follow-up revealed extremely small stature, heart defects, and developmental delay. Patient 2 was a 31-year-old short-statured female who was living independently: 46,XX,r(15)(p11q26). Both cases showed loss of the 15q subtelomeric region by fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH). To investigate the discordance in phenotypes between the two patients, we undertook array comparative genomic hybridization (array CGH) analyses to more fully characterize the deletions associated with these otherwise structurally indistinguishable r(15) chromosomes from conventional cytogenetic analyses and fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) studies. By array CGH, patient 1 showed deletion of multiple contiguous clones predicting an approximately 6 Mb deletion of distal 15q. In contrast, patient 2 showed loss of just the 15q subtelomeric clone and an interstitial clone by array CGH confirming that the severity of the phenotype correlated with the size of the deletion at the molecular level. These cases illustrate the utility of array CGH characterization for determining the size of the associated deletion in ring chromosomes and for facilitating phenotype-genotype correlations.

Indexed as

Chromosomes, Human, Pair 15Ring ChromosomesAdultChromosome AberrationsFemaleGenotypeHumansIn Situ Hybridization, FluorescenceKaryotypingNucleic Acid HybridizationPhenotypePregnancyPrenatal Diagnosis

Identifiers

PMID16267671
OpenAlexW2049810251

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.