ArticleHuman genetics2006
Ring chromosome 15: characterization by array CGH.
Article in Human genetics, 2006. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
11 citing papers in PubMed, 105 citations in OpenAlex.
- Prenatal Sonographic Features of Ring Chromosome 15: A Case Report and Literature Review.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Article
- The phenotype and rhGH treatment response of ring Chromosome 15 Syndrome: Case report and literature review.Molecular genetics & genomic medicine · 2021Review
- Towards New Approaches to Evaluate Dynamic Mosaicism in Ring Chromosome 13 Syndrome.Case reports in genetics · 2019Article
- Ring chromosome 15 - cytogenetics and mapping arrays: a case report and review of the literature.Journal of medical case reports · 2018Review
- Array Characterization of Prenatally Diagnosed 15q26 Microdeletion and 2q37.1 Duplication: Report of a New Case with Multicystic Kidneys and Review of the Literature.Journal of pediatric genetics · 2017Article
- Prenatal diagnosis of a fetus with ring chromosomal 15 by two- and three-dimensional ultrasonography.Case reports in obstetrics and gynecology · 2014Article
- Ophthalmic treatment and vision care of a patient with rare ring chromosome 15: a case report.Case reports in pediatrics · 2014Article
- Ring autosomes: some unexpected findings.Balkan journal of medical genetics : BJMG · 2012Article
- Twenty-year cytogenetic and molecular follow-up of a patient with ring chromosome 15: a case report.Journal of medical case reports · 2012Article
- Mechanisms of ring chromosome formation, ring instability and clinical consequences.BMC medical genetics · 2011Article
- Characterization of a cryptic 3.3 Mb deletion in a patient with a "balanced t(15;22) translocation" using high density oligo array CGH and gene expression arrays.American journal of medical genetics. Part A · 2008Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors at 5 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
Abstract
Ring chromosome 15 [r(15)] is an uncommon finding with less than 50 patients reported. Precise genotype-phenotype correlations are problematic because of the difficulties in determining the extent of euchromatic loss, the level of mosaicism, and the influence of the timing of ascertainment. We report two discordant examples of r(15) patients. In the first case, prenatal diagnosis of a de novo r(15) was made during the second trimester: mos 46,XX,r(15)(p11.2q26)[32]/45,XX,-15[13]/47,XX,r(15)(p11.2q26)x2[3]/46,XX,dic r(15)(p11.2q26p11.2q26[1]/46,XX[2]. Postnatal follow-up revealed extremely small stature, heart defects, and developmental delay. Patient 2 was a 31-year-old short-statured female who was living independently: 46,XX,r(15)(p11q26). Both cases showed loss of the 15q subtelomeric region by fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH). To investigate the discordance in phenotypes between the two patients, we undertook array comparative genomic hybridization (array CGH) analyses to more fully characterize the deletions associated with these otherwise structurally indistinguishable r(15) chromosomes from conventional cytogenetic analyses and fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) studies. By array CGH, patient 1 showed deletion of multiple contiguous clones predicting an approximately 6 Mb deletion of distal 15q. In contrast, patient 2 showed loss of just the 15q subtelomeric clone and an interstitial clone by array CGH confirming that the severity of the phenotype correlated with the size of the deletion at the molecular level. These cases illustrate the utility of array CGH characterization for determining the size of the associated deletion in ring chromosomes and for facilitating phenotype-genotype correlations.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.