Evidence map›Paper›PMID 16265346›Full record

ReviewBritish journal of cancer2005

Neuronal characteristics of small-cell lung cancer.

P U Onganer, M J Seckl, M B A Djamgoz

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in British journal of cancer, 2005. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 44 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
44citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

44 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Metastatic organotropism in small cell lung cancer.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2025
    Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Ion Transporting Proteins and Cancer: Progress and Perspectives.Reviews of physiology, biochemistry and pharmacology · 2022
    Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Tumor progression: the neuronal input.Annals of translational medicine · 2018
    Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

P U OnganerDivision of Cell and Molecular Biology, Imperial College London, South Kensington Campus, UK.
M J Seckl
M B A Djamgoz

Funding

Wellcome Trust
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Wide ranging experimental evidence suggests that human small-cell lung cancer (SCLC) has a number of molecular and subcellular characteristics normally associated with neurones. This review outlines and discusses these characteristics in the light of recent developments in the field. Emphasis is placed upon neuronal cell adhesion molecules, neurone-restrictive silencer factor, neurotransmitters/peptides and voltage-gated ion, especially Na(+) channels. The hypothesis is put forward that acquisition of such characteristics and the membrane 'excitability' that would follow can accelerate metastatic progression. The clinical potential of the neuronal characteristics of SCLC, in particular ion channel expression/activity, is discussed in relation to possible novel diagnostic and therapeutic modalities.

Indexed as

Carcinoma, Small CellHumansLung NeoplasmsMembrane PotentialsNeural Cell Adhesion MoleculesNeuronsSodium ChannelsNeural Cell Adhesion MoleculesSodium Channels

Identifiers

PMID16265346
PMCPMC2361510

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.