Evidence map›Paper›PMID 16264426›Full record

ReviewEMBO reports2005

Membrane protein insertion: mixing eukaryotic and prokaryotic concepts.

Enrico Schleiff, Jürgen Soll

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in EMBO reports, 2005. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 67 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
67citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

67 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. The big BAM theory: An open and closed case?Biochimica et biophysica acta. Biomembranes · 2020
    Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article

7 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Enrico SchleiffDepartment of Biology I, Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität Munich, Menzinger Strasse 67, 80638 Munich, Germany. schleiff@lrz.uni-muenchen.de
Jürgen Soll

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Proteins are translocated across or inserted into membranes by machines that are composed of soluble and membrane-anchored subunits. The molecular action of these machines and their evolutionary origin are at present the focus of intense research. For instance, our understanding of the mode of insertion of beta-barrel membrane proteins into the outer membrane of endosymbiotically derived organelles has increased rapidly during the past few years. In particular, the identification of the Omp85/YaeT-involving pathways in Neisseria meningitidis, Escherichia coli and cyanobacteria, and homologues of Omp85/YaeT in chloroplasts and mitochondria, has provided new clues about the ancestral beta-barrel protein insertion pathway. This review focuses on recent advances in the elucidation of the evolutionarily conserved concepts that underlie the translocation and insertion of beta-barrel membrane proteins.

Indexed as

AnimalsArabidopsis ProteinsBacteriaBacterial Outer Membrane ProteinsCarrier ProteinsChloroplastsEukaryotic CellsHumansMembrane ProteinsMitochondriaMitochondrial Precursor Protein Import Complex ProteinsPlantsProkaryotic CellsProtein PrecursorsProtein TransportArabidopsis ProteinsBacterial Outer Membrane ProteinsCarrier ProteinsMembrane ProteinsMitochondrial Precursor Protein Import Complex ProteinsOmp85 protein, NeisseriaProtein PrecursorsTOC75 protein, Arabidopsis

Identifiers

PMID16264426
PMCPMC1371041

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.