Evidence map›Paper›PMID 16264194›Full record

ArticleGenes & development2005

Genomic analysis of LexA binding reveals the permissive nature of the Escherichia coli genome and identifies unconventional target sites.

Joseph T Wade, Nikos B Reppas, George M Church, Kevin Struhl

Open access · diamondAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Genes & development, 2005. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 98 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
98citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

98 citing papers in PubMed, 162 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Mapping theMicrobiology (Reading, England) · 2024
    Article
  7. Repression ofJournal of bacteriology · 2024
    Article
  8. Article
  9. The global RNA-RNA interactome ofProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2024
    Article
  10. Engineered calprotectin-sensing probiotics for IBD surveillance in humans.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2023
    Article
  11. TheHeliyon · 2023
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. The Regulation of LexA on UV-Induced SOS Response inJournal of microbiology and biotechnology · 2021
    Article
  18. ThemSphere · 2021
    Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

38 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Joseph T WadeDepartment of Biological Chemistry and Molecular Pharmacology, Harvard University, Boston, Massachusetts 02115, USA.
Nikos B Reppas
George M Church
Kevin Struhl
Harvard University · US

Funding

MOLECULAR MECHANISMS OF YEAST TRANSCRIPTIONAL INITIATIONR01GM030186 · NIGMS · HARVARD UNIVERSITY (MEDICAL SCHOOL) · PI STRUHL, KEVIN · 1985 to 2018
$13.6M
MECHANISMS OF YEAST TRANSCRIPTIONAL INITITATIONR37GM030186 · NIGMS · HARVARD UNIVERSITY (MEDICAL SCHOOL) · PI STRUHL, KEVIN · 1993 to 2002
$2.1M
NIGMS NIH HHS GM30186NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM030186NIGMS NIH HHS R37 GM030186
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Genomes of eukaryotic organisms are packaged into nucleosomes that restrict the binding of transcription factors to accessible regions. Bacteria do not contain histones, but they have nucleoid-associated proteins that have been proposed to function analogously. Here, we combine chromatin immunoprecipitation and high-density oligonucleotide microarrays to define the in vivo DNA targets of the LexA transcriptional repressor in Escherichia coli. We demonstrate a near-universal relationship between the presence of a LexA sequence motif, LexA binding in vitro, and LexA binding in vivo, suggesting that a suitable recognition site for LexA is sufficient for binding in vivo. Consistent with this observation, LexA binds comparably to ectopic target sites introduced at various positions in the genome. We also identify approximately 20 novel LexA targets that lack a canonical LexA sequence motif, are not bound by LexA in vitro, and presumably require an additional factor for binding in vivo. Our results indicate that, unlike eukaryotic genomes, the E. coli genome is permissive to transcription factor binding. The permissive nature of the E. coli genome has important consequences for the nature of transcriptional regulatory proteins, biological specificity, and evolution.

Indexed as

Bacterial ProteinsBinding SitesChromatin ImmunoprecipitationDNA, BacterialDNA-Binding ProteinsEscherichia coliEukaryotic CellsEvolution, MolecularGene Expression Regulation, BacterialGenome, BacterialLexA Repressor ProteinNucleosomesProtein BindingSerine EndopeptidasesBacterial ProteinsDNA, BacterialDNA-Binding ProteinsH-NS protein, bacteriaLexA Repressor ProteinNucleosomesSerine Endopeptidases

Identifiers

PMID16264194
PMCPMC1276735
OpenAlexW2155516053

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.