Evidence map›Paper›PMID 16261194›Full record

ArticlePLoS computational biology2005

SNPdetector: a software tool for sensitive and accurate SNP detection.

Jinghui Zhang, David A Wheeler, Imtiaz Yakub, Sharon Wei, Raman Sood, William Rowe, Paul P Liu, Richard A Gibbs, Kenneth H Buetow

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PLoS computational biology, 2005. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 67 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
67citing papers in PubMed
2.0field-weighted citation impact, top 14% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

67 citing papers in PubMed, 125 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. MLH1-rheMac hereditary nonpolyposis colorectal cancer syndrome in rhesus macaques.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2018
    Article
  8. Current Progresses of Single Cell DNA Sequencing in Breast Cancer Research.International journal of biological sciences · 2017
    Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Improved candidate drug mining for Alzheimer's disease.BioMed research international · 2014
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

7 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 5 institutions in 1 country.

Jinghui ZhangLaboratory of Population Genetics, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland, United States of America. jinghuiz@mail.nih.gov
David A Wheeler
Imtiaz Yakub
Sharon Wei
Raman Sood
William Rowe
Paul P Liu
Richard A Gibbs
Kenneth H Buetow
Baylor College of Medicine · USBaylor Genetics · USNational Human Genome Research Institute · USNational Institutes of Health · USNational Cancer Institute · US

Funding

GENETIC ANALYSIS OF ZEBRAFISH EMBRYO DEVELOPMENTZIAHG000102 · NHGRI · NATIONAL HUMAN GENOME RESEARCH INSTITUTE · PI LIU, PAUL · 2009 to 2025
$17.1M
GENETIC ANALYSIS OF ZEBRAFISH EMBRYO DEVELOPMENTZ01HG000102 · NHGRI · NATIONAL HUMAN GENOME RESEARCH INSTITUTE · PI LIU, PU PAUL · 1997 to 2008
$1.7M
Intramural NIH HHS
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Identification of single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) and mutations is important for the discovery of genetic predisposition to complex diseases. PCR resequencing is the method of choice for de novo SNP discovery. However, manual curation of putative SNPs has been a major bottleneck in the application of this method to high-throughput screening. Therefore it is critical to develop a more sensitive and accurate computational method for automated SNP detection. We developed a software tool, SNPdetector, for automated identification of SNPs and mutations in fluorescence-based resequencing reads. SNPdetector was designed to model the process of human visual inspection and has a very low false positive and false negative rate. We demonstrate the superior performance of SNPdetector in SNP and mutation analysis by comparing its results with those derived by human inspection, PolyPhred (a popular SNP detection tool), and independent genotype assays in three large-scale investigations. The first study identified and validated inter- and intra-subspecies variations in 4,650 traces of 25 inbred mouse strains that belong to either the Mus musculus species or the M. spretus species. Unexpected heterozygosity in CAST/Ei strain was observed in two out of 1,167 mouse SNPs. The second study identified 11,241 candidate SNPs in five ENCODE regions of the human genome covering 2.5 Mb of genomic sequence. Approximately 50% of the candidate SNPs were selected for experimental genotyping; the validation rate exceeded 95%. The third study detected ENU-induced mutations (at 0.04% allele frequency) in 64,896 traces of 1,236 zebra fish. Our analysis of three large and diverse test datasets demonstrated that SNPdetector is an effective tool for genome-scale research and for large-sample clinical studies. SNPdetector runs on Unix/Linux platform and is available publicly (http://lpg.nci.nih.gov).

Indexed as

Polymorphism, Single NucleotideAlgorithmsAllelesAnimalsComputational BiologyGene FrequencyGenomeGenotypeHeterozygoteHumansPolymorphism, GeneticReproducibility of ResultsSensitivity and SpecificitySoftware

Identifiers

PMID16261194
PMCPMC1274293
OpenAlexW2044586667

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.