Evidence map›Paper›PMID 16260603›Full record

ArticleMolecular and cellular biology2005

Smooth muscle-specific genes are differentially sensitive to inhibition by Elk-1.

Jiliang Zhou, Guoqing Hu, B Paul Herring

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Molecular and cellular biology, 2005. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 33 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
33citing papers in PubMed
2.0field-weighted citation impact, top 14% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

33 citing papers in PubMed, 68 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. The Aftermath of Bronchoconstriction.Journal of engineering and science in medical diagnostics and therapy · 2019
    Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Signaling mechanisms that regulate smooth muscle cell differentiation.Arteriosclerosis, thrombosis, and vascular biology · 2011
    Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Jiliang ZhouDepartment of Cellular and Integrative Physiology, Indiana University School of Medicine, 635 Barnhill Drive, Indianapolis, Indiana 46202-5120, USA.
Guoqing Hu
B Paul Herring
Indiana University School of Medicine

Funding

Visceral smooth muscle-specific gene expressionR01DK061130 · NIDDK · INDIANA UNIV-PURDUE UNIV AT INDIANAPOLIS · PI HERRING, BRIAN PAUL · 2001 to 2011
$2.8M
TELOKIN GENE REGULATION IN SMOOTH MUSCLER01HL058571 · NHLBI · INDIANA UNIV-PURDUE UNIV AT INDIANAPOLIS · PI HERRING, BRIAN PAUL · 1998 to 2005
$1.7M
Synthetic smooth muscle cell-selective promotersR01DK065644 · NIDDK · INDIANA UNIV-PURDUE UNIV AT INDIANAPOLIS · PI HERRING, BRIAN PAUL · 2004 to 2006
$851k
NHLBI NIH HHS HL58571NHLBI NIH HHS R01 HL058571NIDDK NIH HHS DK61130NIDDK NIH HHS DK65644NIDDK NIH HHS R01 DK061130NIDDK NIH HHS R01 DK065644
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Understanding the mechanism of smooth muscle cell (SMC) differentiation will provide the foundation for elucidating SMC-related diseases, such as atherosclerosis, restenosis, and asthma. In the current study, overexpression of Elk-1 in SMCs down-regulated expression of several endogenous smooth muscle-restricted proteins, including telokin, SM22alpha, and smooth muscle alpha-actin. In contrast, down-regulation of endogenous Elk-1 in smooth muscle cells increased the expression of only telokin and SM22alpha, suggesting that smooth muscle-specific promoters are differentially sensitive to the inhibitory effects of Elk-1. Consistent with this, overexpression of the DNA binding domain of Elk-1, which acts as a dominant-negative protein by displacing endogenous Elk-1, enhanced the expression of telokin and SM22alpha without affecting expression of smooth muscle alpha-actin. Elk-1 suppressed the activity of smooth muscle-restricted promoters, including the telokin promoter that does not contain a consensus Elk-1 binding site, through its ability to block myocardin-induced activation of the promoters. Gel mobility shift and chromatin immunoprecipitation assays revealed that Elk-1 binds to a nonconsensus binding site in the telokin promoter and Elk-1 binding is dependent on serum response factor (SRF) binding to a nearby CArG box. Although overexpression of the SRF-binding B-box domain of Elk-1 is sufficient to repress the myocardin activation of the telokin promoter, this repression is not as complete as that seen with an Elk-1 fragment that includes the DNA binding domain. In addition, reporter gene assays demonstrate that an intact Elk-1 binding site in the telokin promoter is required for Elk-1 to maximally inhibit promoter activity. Together, these data suggest that the differential sensitivity of smooth muscle-specific genes to inhibition by Elk-1 may play a role in the complex changes in smooth muscle-specific protein expression that are observed under pathological conditions.

Indexed as

ActinsAdenoviridaeAnimalsBase SequenceBinding SitesBlotting, WesternCell DifferentiationCell LineChromatinChromatin ImmunoprecipitationDNADose-Response Relationship, DrugDown-Regulationets-Domain Protein Elk-1Gene Expression RegulationGenes, DominantActinsChromatinDNAets-Domain Protein Elk-1LuciferasesMicrofilament ProteinsMuscle ProteinsMyocardinMyosin-Light-Chain KinaseNuclear ProteinsPeptide FragmentsPeptidesProto-Oncogene Proteins c-fosRNA, Small InterferingSerum Response FactortelokinTrans-Activatorstransgelin

Identifiers

PMID16260603
PMCPMC1280275
OpenAlexW2136768622

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.