Evidence map›Paper›PMID 16260388›Full record

ReviewNeurotoxicity research2005

Rodent model systems for studies of HIV-1 associated dementia.

Y Persidsky, R Potula, J Haorah

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Neurotoxicity research, 2005. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Battle of animal models.Journal of neuroimmune pharmacology : the official journal of the Society on NeuroImmune Pharmacology · 2007
    Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Neuroimmunity and the blood-brain barrier: molecular regulation of leukocyte transmigration and viral entry into the nervous system with a focus on neuroAIDS.Journal of neuroimmune pharmacology : the official journal of the Society on NeuroImmune Pharmacology · 2006
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Y PersidskyCenter for Neurovirology and Neurodegenerative Disorders, University of Nebraska Medical Center, Omaha, NE 68198, USA. ypersids@unmc.edu
R Potula
J Haorah

Funding

Proteomics CoreP01NS043985 · NINDS · UNIVERSITY OF NEBRASKA MEDICAL CENTER · PI ZHENG, JIALIN CHARLES · 2003 to 2012
$11.8M
BBB Tight Junctions During HIV-1 dementiaR01MH065151 · NIMH · UNIVERSITY OF NEBRASKA MEDICAL CENTER · PI PERSIDSKY, YURI · 2002 to 2016
$5.9M
Effect of Alcohol on HIV-1 Immune Responses &BBB DamageR21AA013846 · NIAAA · UNIVERSITY OF NEBRASKA MEDICAL CENTER · PI PERSIDSKY, YURI · 2002 to 2004
$882k
NIAAA NIH HHS R21 AA013846NIMH NIH HHS R01 MH65151NINDS NIH HHS 1P01 NS043985
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Understanding of HIV-1 neuropathogenesis and development of rationale therapeutic approaches requires relevant animal models. The putative mechanisms of neuroinflammatory and neurotoxic events triggered by HIV-1 brain infection are reflected by a number of rodent models. These include transgenic animals (either expressing viral proteins or pro-inflammatory factors), infection with murine retroviruses, and severe combined immunodeficient (SCID) mice reconstituted with human lymphocytes and injected intracerebrally with HIV-1-infected human monocyte-derived macrophages. The potential importance and limitations of the models in reflecting human disease are discussed with emphasis on their utility for development of therapies to combat HIV-1-associated neurologic impairment.

Indexed as

AIDS Dementia ComplexAnimalsDisease Models, AnimalEncephalitis, ViralHIV-1HumansMiceMice, SCIDMice, TransgenicRatsRetroviridae

Identifiers

PMID16260388

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.