Evidence map›Paper›PMID 16258774›Full record

ReviewZeitschrift fur Kardiologie2005

Hypertriglyceridemia-why, when and how should it be treated?

I Gouni-Berthold, W Krone

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Zeitschrift fur Kardiologie, 2005. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
0.7field-weighted citation impact, top 28% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed, 7 citations in OpenAlex.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

I Gouni-BertholdDepartment of Internal Medicine II, University of Cologne and Center of Moleclar Medicine Cologne (CMMC), Joseph-Stelzmann-Str. 9, 50924 Cologne, Germany. Wilhelm.krone@uk-koeln.de
W Krone
University of Cologne · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The relationship between serum triglyceride levels and cardiovascular disease has remained enigmatic despite four decades of research. The majority of the available evidence tends to support the role of hypertriglyceridemia as an independent risk factor for cardiovascular disease. However, there are no guidelines recommending a target triglyceride level for prevention of cardiovascular disease. The focus of lipid lowering therapy still remains the reduction of global cardiovascular risk by optimizing LDL cholesterol levels. Therapeutic options for triglyceride-lowering include lifestyle modification and pharmacological agents, such as fibrates, omega 3 fatty acids and niacin. Post-hoc analyses of the Helsinki Heart Study, Veterans Affairs High-Density Lipoprotein Cholesterol Intervention Trial and Bezafibrate Infarction Prevention Study suggest a beneficial effect of the treatment of hypertriglyceridemia with fibrates, mainly in obese subjects with insulin resistance. However, in order to establish the actual clinical relevance of lowering triglyceride levels, prospective trials need to be conducted with the specific purpose of studying the effects of triglyceride reduction on clinical end points, i. e. coronary events and stroke.

Indexed as

Risk Reduction BehaviorCardiovascular DiseasesClinical Trials as TopicClofibric AcidComorbidityEvidence-Based MedicineFatty Acids, Omega-3HumansHypertriglyceridemiaNiacinRisk AssessmentRisk FactorsClofibric AcidFatty Acids, Omega-3Niacin

Identifiers

PMID16258774
OpenAlexW2398884925

What OpenQuestion holds

Texttitle and abstract
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.