Evidence map›Paper›PMID 16257980›Full record

ArticleNucleic acids research2005

Correlation between sequence conservation and the genomic context after gene duplication.

Richard A Notebaart, Martijn A Huynen, Bas Teusink, Roland J Siezen, Berend Snel

Erratum issuedOpen access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Nucleic acids research, 2005. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 29 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
29citing papers in PubMed
2.5field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

29 citing papers in PubMed, 54 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. PanCGH: a genotype-calling algorithm for pangenome CGH data.Bioinformatics (Oxford, England) · 2009
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

  • Erratum issued
5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Richard A NotebaartCenter for Molecular and Biomolecular Informatics, Radboud University, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
Martijn A Huynen
Bas Teusink
Roland J Siezen
Berend Snel
Radboud University Nijmegen · NL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

A key complication in comparative genomics for reliable gene function prediction is the existence of duplicated genes. To study the effect of gene duplication on function prediction, we analyze orthologs between pairs of genomes where in one genome the orthologous gene has duplicated after the speciation of the two genomes (i.e. inparalogs). For these duplicated genes we investigate whether the gene that is most similar on the sequence level is also the gene that has retained the ancestral gene-neighborhood. Although the majority of investigated cases show a consistent pattern between sequence similarity and gene-neighborhood conservation, a substantial fraction, 29-38%, is inconsistent. The observation of inconsistency is not the result of a chance outcome owing to a lack of divergence time between inparalogs, but rather it seems to be the result of a chance outcome caused by very similar rates of sequence evolution of both inparalogs relative to their ortholog. If one-to-one orthologous relationships are required, it is advisable to combine contextual information (i.e. gene-neighborhood in prokaryotes and co-expression in eukaryotes) with protein sequence information to predict the most probable functional equivalent ortholog in the presence of inparalogs.

Indexed as

Evolution, MolecularGene DuplicationArtifactsBacterial ProteinsBase SequenceConserved SequenceGenes, BacterialGenome, BacterialGenomicsMultigene FamilyOperonBacterial Proteinsrfb protein, Bacteria

Identifiers

PMID16257980
PMCPMC1275583
OpenAlexW2143825552

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.