Evidence map›Paper›PMID 16255080›Full record

ArticleNature2005

A haplotype map of the human genome.

International HapMap Consortium

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Nature, 2005. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2,545 papers, 6 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2,545citing papers in PubMed, 6 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2,545 citing papers in PubMed, 6 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Pooled it
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Circulation. Genomic and precision medicine · 2026
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

2,485 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

International HapMap Consortium

Funding

TECHNOLOGIES FOR DIALLELIC MARKER DISCOVERY AND TESTINGR01HG001720 · NHGRI · WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY · PI KWOK, PUI-YAN · 1997 to 2007
$9.6M
NHGRI NIH HHS R01 HG001720Wellcome Trust
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Inherited genetic variation has a critical but as yet largely uncharacterized role in human disease. Here we report a public database of common variation in the human genome: more than one million single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) for which accurate and complete genotypes have been obtained in 269 DNA samples from four populations, including ten 500-kilobase regions in which essentially all information about common DNA variation has been extracted. These data document the generality of recombination hotspots, a block-like structure of linkage disequilibrium and low haplotype diversity, leading to substantial correlations of SNPs with many of their neighbours. We show how the HapMap resource can guide the design and analysis of genetic association studies, shed light on structural variation and recombination, and identify loci that may have been subject to natural selection during human evolution.

Indexed as

Genome, HumanChromosomes, Human, YDNA, MitochondrialGene FrequencyHaplotypesHumansLinkage DisequilibriumPolymorphism, Single NucleotideRecombination, GeneticSelection, GeneticDNA, Mitochondrial

Identifiers

PMID16255080
PMCPMC1880871

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.