Evidence map›Paper›PMID 16254752›Full record

ArticleJournal of occupational rehabilitation2005

Prevention of work disability due to musculoskeletal disorders: the challenge of implementing evidence.

Patrick Loisel, Rachelle Buchbinder, Rowland Hazard, Robert Keller, Inger Scheel, Maurits van Tulder, Barbara Webster

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of occupational rehabilitation, 2005. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 145 papers, 9 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
145citing papers in PubMed, 9 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

145 citing papers in PubMed, 9 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Pooled it
  7. Pooled it
  8. Pooled it
  9. Pooled it
  10. Trial
  11. Trial
  12. Trial
  13. Trial
  14. Trial
  15. Trial
  16. Trial
  17. Trial
  18. Trial
  19. Article
  20. Article

85 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Patrick LoiselDisability Prevention Research and Training Center, Université de Sherbrooke, 1111 St-Charles West, Suite 101, Longueuil, J4K 5G4, Québec, Canada. patrick.loisel@usherbrooke.ca
Rachelle Buchbinder
Rowland Hazard
Robert Keller
Inger Scheel
Maurits van Tulder
Barbara Webster

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe process of returning disabled workers to work presents numerous challenges. In spite of the growing evidence regarding work disability prevention, little uptake of this evidence has been observed. One reason for limited dissemination of evidence is the complexity of the problem, as it is subject to multiple legal, administrative, social, political, and cultural challenges. PURPOSE AND

methodsA literature review and collection of experts' opinion is presented, on the current evidence for work disability prevention, and barriers to evidence implementation. Recommendations are presented for enhancing implementation of research results.

conclusionThe current evidence regarding work disability prevention shows that some clinical interventions (advice to return to modified work and graded activity programs) and some non-clinical interventions (at a service and policy/community level but not at a practice level) are effective in reducing work absenteeism. Implementation of evidence in work disability is a major challenge because intervention recommendations are often imprecise and not yet practical for immediate use, many barriers exist, and many stakeholders are involved. Future studies should involve all relevant stakeholders and aim at developing new strategies that are effective, efficient, and have a potential for successful implementation. These studies should be based upon a clearer conceptualization of the broader context and inter-relationships that determine return to work outcomes.

Indexed as

Evidence-Based MedicineHealth Plan ImplementationAttitude to HealthCanadaHumansMusculoskeletal DiseasesOccupational DiseasesOccupational Health ServicesSick LeaveUnited States

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.