Evidence map›Paper›PMID 16254729›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of legal medicine2006

An unusual case of homicidal near drowning followed by electrocution.

H Pfeiffer, A Du Chesne, B Brinkmann

Abstract readCase Reports
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of legal medicine, 2006. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
0.8field-weighted citation impact, top 26% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 23 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. An instance of homicide by electrocution with hand-made electrode plates.Forensic science, medicine, and pathology · 2023
    Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Just another railway fatality.International journal of legal medicine · 2020
    Article
  8. Homicide by drowning.Forensic science, medicine, and pathology · 2019
    Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Vertebral column kyphoscoliosis and unexpected death.International journal of legal medicine · 2008
    Article
  13. Fatal impalement injury of the head due to a curtain rail.International journal of legal medicine · 2006
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

H PfeifferInstitute of Legal Medicine, Röntgenstr. 23, 48149, Münster, Germany. pfeiffh@uni-muenster.de
A Du Chesne
B Brinkmann
Institute of Legal Economics · RUUniversity Hospital Münster · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

A young woman was found dead in a bath-tub with her facial orifices under water and current burn marks at the right big toe and at the neck near the hairline. Initial police investigations assumed an accidental electric shock due to a radio falling into the water. The forensic autopsy was followed by extensive histology and immunohistochemistry of the internal organs and skin marks. Intensive vital reactions of a near-drowning were detected that suggested a survival period of at least 20 min. Furthermore, an energy dispersive x-ray spectroscopy analysis on the current burn marks and on possible current applicators was performed, as well as reconstruction experiments with a cadaver of a pig that had been slaughtered shortly before. The results of all investigations revealed a two-step procedure with a primary near-drowning and a final current application with consecutive cardiac arrest.

Indexed as

Forensic PathologyHomicideAdultAnimalsContusionsElectric InjuriesFemaleHeart ArrestHemorrhageHumansImmunohistochemistryKidneyLungMaleMyocardiumNear Drowning

Identifiers

PMID16254729
OpenAlexW2066570763

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.