ArticleJournal of human hypertension2006
Aim, design and methods of the 'reasons for not intensifying antihypertensive treatment' (RIAT): an international registry in essential hypertension.
Article in Journal of human hypertension, 2006. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.
- Trends in time to confirmation and recognition of new-onset hypertension, 2002-2006.Hypertension (Dallas, Tex. : 1979) · 2010Article
- Reasons for therapeutic inertia when managing hypertension in clinical practice in non-Western countries.Journal of human hypertension · 2009Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors at 6 institutions in 6 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Failure of physicians to adhere to hypertension guidelines may partly account for the failure to achieve blood pressure (BP) goals in clinical practice. The aim of this trial is a comprehensive description of the approach of physicians in the management of high BP among primary care patients. It will primarily assess what are the Reasons for not Intensifying an Antihypertensive Treatment (RIAT), when predefined individual BP goals are not achieved. Open intervention survey was conducted in 17 countries in Latin America, Eastern Europe, Africa and Asia in family practices, government and private clinics. The registry is based on a three-step epidemiological design. Step one shall identify guidelines and recommendations taken as reference in each country for the management of hypertension. Step two will assess the variance between individual targets defined by physicians in their practice compared to guidelines and recommendations. Step three is a prospective registry where physicians collect patient data at baseline; determine individual target BP values. Several follow-up visits are proposed to monitor achievement of these targets. Step three of RIAT aims at providing responses to several key objectives. Recruitment is under way aiming at enrolling 33,000 patients. To identify, what is the BP targeted according to the risk factor profile and what are the reasons for not modifying an antihypertensive treatment when BP goals are not reached, and to analyse the type of antihypertensive drugs prescribed according to compelling indications and to assess the percentage of patients reaching target figures.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.