Evidence map›Paper›PMID 16251385›Full record

ArticleRNA (New York, N.Y.)2005

Differences and similarities between Drosophila and mammalian 3' end processing of histone pre-mRNAs.

Zbigniew Dominski, Xiao-Cui Yang, Mathew Purdy, William F Marzluff

Open access · bronzeAbstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in RNA (New York, N.Y.), 2005. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed
0.8field-weighted citation impact, top 30% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed, 26 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Molecular mechanisms for the regulation of histone mRNA stem-loop-binding protein by phosphorylation.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2014
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. U7 snRNAs: a computational survey.Genomics, proteomics & bioinformatics · 2007
    Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 2 countries.

Zbigniew DominskiDepartment of Biochemistry and Biophysics, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC 27599, USA. dominski@med.unc.edu
Xiao-Cui Yang
Mathew Purdy
William F Marzluff
University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill · US

Funding

HISTONE MRNA REGULATION IN DEVELOPMENTR01GM058921 · NIGMS · UNIV OF NORTH CAROLINA CHAPEL HILL · PI DURONIO, ROBERT J, MARZLUFF, WILLIAM F. · 1999 to 2025
$11.6M
NIGMS NIH HHS GM58921NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM058921
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

We used nuclear extracts from Drosophila Kc cells to characterize 3' end processing of Drosophila histone pre-mRNAs. Drosophila SLBP plays a critical role in recruiting the U 7 snRNP to the pre-mRNA and is essential for processing all five Drosophila histone pre-mRNAs. The Drosophila processing machinery strongly prefers cleavage after a fourth nucleotide following the stem-loop and favors an adenosine over pyrimidines in this position. Increasing the distance between the stem-loop and the HDE does not result in a corresponding shift of the cleavage site, suggesting that in Drosophila processing the U 7 snRNP does not function as a molecular ruler. Instead, SLBP directs the cleavage site close to the stem-loop. The upstream cleavage product generated in Drosophila nuclear extracts contains a 3' OH, and the downstream cleavage product is degraded by a nuclease dependent on the U 7 snRNP, suggesting that the cleavage factor has been conserved between Drosophila and mammalian processing. A 2'O-methyl oligonucleotide complementary to the first 17 nt of the Drosophila U 7 snRNA was not able to deplete the U 7 snRNP from Drosophila nuclear extracts, suggesting that the 5' end of the Drosophila U 7 snRNA is inaccessible. This oligonucleotide selectively inhibited processing of only two Drosophila pre-mRNAs and had no effect on processing of the other three pre-mRNAs. Together, these studies demonstrate that although Drosophila and mammalian histone pre-mRNA processing share common features, there are also significant differences, likely reflecting divergence in the mechanism of 3' end processing between vertebrates and invertebrates.

Indexed as

RNA Processing, Post-TranscriptionalAnimalsBase SequenceCell NucleusDrosophilaDrosophila ProteinsHistonesMiceMolecular Sequence DataMutationRibonucleoprotein, U7 Small NuclearRNA-Binding ProteinsRNA PrecursorsSubstrate SpecificityDrosophila ProteinsHistonesRibonucleoprotein, U7 Small NuclearRNA-Binding ProteinsRNA PrecursorsSLBP protein, Drosophila

Identifiers

PMID16251385
PMCPMC1370872
OpenAlexW2129104583

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.