ArticleAntimicrobial agents and chemotherapy2005
Evaluation of antibiotic treatment against "Candidatus Helicobacter suis" in a mouse model.
Article in Antimicrobial agents and chemotherapy, 2005. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 16 citations in OpenAlex.
- Gastric Helicobacter species associated with dogs, cats and pigs: significance for public and animal health.Veterinary research · 2022Review
- Helicobacter heilmannii sensu lato: an overview of the infection in humans.World journal of gastroenterology · 2014Review
- Gastric helicobacters in domestic animals and nonhuman primates and their significance for human health.Clinical microbiology reviews · 2009Review
- Evaluation of antibiotic therapy for eradication of "Candidatus Helicobacter heilmannii".Antimicrobial agents and chemotherapy · 2008Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
"Helicobacter heilmannii" (proposed name) type 1 colonizes the human stomach. It has been shown to be identical to "Candidatus Helicobacter suis," a Helicobacter species colonizing the stomachs of >60% of slaughter pigs. This bacterium has not been isolated in vitro until now. Antibiotic susceptibility testing of "Candidatus Helicobacter suis" has not been carried out so far. For the present study, a mouse model was adopted to evaluate the antibiotic susceptibility of this organism. Mice infected with "Candidatus Helicobacter suis" were treated with amoxicillin and omeprazole, a therapy which is used to treat H. heilmannii infections in humans. Two different isolates of "Candidatus Helicobacter suis" were tested. The excretion of bacterial DNA was assessed during treatment, using PCR on fecal samples. At the end of the experiment, 8 days after the cessation of treatment, the presence of infection was evaluated using a urease test and a PCR test on stomach samples. A marked decrease in the excretion of bacterial DNA was observed a few days after the onset of treatment, and the level remained low until the end of the experiment. A difference in susceptibility between the two "Candidatus Helicobacter suis" isolates was pointed out. The in vivo mouse model infected with "Candidatus Helicobacter suis" will be useful for further screening of potential therapeutic regimens.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.