SynthesisDrugs & aging2005
Antipsychotics for behavioural and psychological problems in elderly people with dementia: a systematic review of adverse events.
Synthesis in Drugs & aging, 2005. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
14 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 51 citations in OpenAlex.
- The consequences of antipsychotic medication use for people living with dementia: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Frontiers in psychiatry · 2026Pooled it
- Do antipsychotics lead to cognitive impairment in dementia? A meta-analysis of randomised placebo-controlled trials.European archives of psychiatry and clinical neuroscience · 2017Pooled it
- Choice of observational study design impacts on measurement of antipsychotic risks in the elderly: a systematic review.BMC medical research methodology · 2012Pooled it
- Improving psychotropic drug prescription in nursing home patients with dementia: design of a cluster randomized controlled trial.BMC psychiatry · 2013Trial
- The effects of individual music therapy in nursing home residents with dementia to improve general well-being: study protocol of a randomized controlled trial.BMC geriatrics · 2024Article
- Potentially Inappropriate Medications Pre- and Post-Diagnosis of Major Neurocognitive Disorders Among Older People in Sweden: A Register-Based, 6-Year Longitudinal Study.Drugs & aging · 2022Article
- Prevalence of potentially inappropriate medications among old people with major neurocognitive disorder in 2012 and 2017.BMC geriatrics · 2022Article
- The Diagnosis of Schizophrenia Among Nursing Home Residents With ADRD: Does Race Matter?The American journal of geriatric psychiatry : official journal of the American Association for Geriatric Psychiatry · 2022Article
- Potentially inappropriate medications in relation to length of nursing home stay among older adults.BMC geriatrics · 2022Article
- Reducing inappropriate psychotropic drug use in nursing home residents with dementia: protocol for participatory action research in a stepped-wedge cluster randomized trial.BMC psychiatry · 2019Article
- PROPER I: frequency and appropriateness of psychotropic drugs use in nursing home patients and its associations: a study protocol.BMC psychiatry · 2013Article
- Grip on challenging behaviour: a multidisciplinary care programme for managing behavioural problems in nursing home residents with dementia. Study protocol.BMC health services research · 2011Article
- Alternatives to atypical antipsychotics for the management of dementia-related agitation.Drugs & aging · 2008Review
- "The Father": As Real as it Gets to Living with Dementia.Indian journal of psychiatryArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveAlthough antipsychotics are important in the treatment of behavioural and psychological symptoms of dementia (BPSD), they have moderate efficacy and often cause adverse events. Recent safety warnings about increased frequency of cerebrovascular adverse events in elderly patients who use atypical antipsychotics mean that physicians now face a dilemma when weighing the benefits and risks of use of antipsychotics in this patient group. This study systematically reviews the reporting of adverse events of antipsychotics used to treat BPSD in randomised, controlled trials (RCTs).
methodsWe searched the MEDLINE, EMBASE, PsychInfo and CINAHL databases (search period 1980 or 1986-April 2005) and the Cochrane controlled trials register (2005) for RCTs that used intention-to-treat analysis to evaluate the efficacy and harms of antipsychotics used to treat BPSD. Two independent reviewers assessed the reporting of adverse events.
resultsScreening of 930 abstracts identified 12 eligible RCTs (2809 patients). Most participants were elderly people (mean age 80 years) with Alzheimer's, vascular or mixed dementia. Studies lasted from 3 to 16 weeks. Adverse events, though common, were described heterogeneously and incompletely. No RCT fulfilled all Consolidated Standards of Reporting Trials requirements for the reporting of harms. Atypical antipsychotics caused fewer extrapyramidal symptoms and less somnolence than typical antipsychotics, but these differences disappeared when dosages were increased. Only one trial reported cerebrovascular adverse events, with a number needed to harm of 14 (95% CI 8, 41).
conclusionsAt lower doses atypical antipsychotics may cause fewer adverse events in the treatment of BPSD, but there is uncertainty about their cerebrovascular safety profile. The RCTs included in this systematic review described adverse events too incompletely and heterogeneously to allow generation of clear treatment recommendations, and they do not provide sufficient evidence to support recent safety warnings. Better reporting on harms in RCTs is needed to enable rational treatment decisions with respect to use of antipsychotics for BPSD.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.