Evidence map›Paper›PMID 16245053›Full record

ArticlePhotosynthesis research2003

Insights into the stress response and sulfur metabolism revealed by proteome analysis of a Chlorobium tepidum mutant lacking the Rubisco-like protein.

Thomas E Hanson, F Robert Tabita

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Photosynthesis research, 2003. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed
4.5field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed, 47 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Microbial pathway for anaerobic 5'-methylthioadenosine metabolism coupled to ethylene formation.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2017
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Thomas E HansonGraduate College of Marine Studies and Delaware Biotechnology Institute, University of Delaware, Newark, DE 19711, USA.
F Robert Tabita
Biotechnology Institute · USThe Ohio State University · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

A significant fraction of the proteome of Chlorobium tepidum is altered in a mutant strain of the green sulfur bacterium C. tepidum (Omega::RLP) lacking the Rubisco-like protein (RLP). Additionally, a number of stress proteins display altered abundance or migration in strain Omega::RLP, including a thioredoxin, a putative Hsp20 family chaperonin, and GroEL. Changes in protein abundance are closely correlated to mRNA abundance in the case of two other stress proteins, a thiol-specific antioxidant protein homolog (Tsa/AhpC) and an iron only superoxide dismutase (Fe-SOD). Strain Omega::RLP is more resistant to hydrogen peroxide exposure than strain WT2321, providing evidence that the stress proteins are functional. Strain Omega::RLP is also defective in thiosulfate oxidation, but is able to oxidize sulfide as well as the wild-type strain. Based on studies with periplasm-enriched extracts of strain Omega::RLP, the loss of thiosulfate oxidation capability correlates with undetectable levels of the Sox Y protein, a component of the predicted thiosulfate oxidation complex. These results provide further indications that sulfur oxidation capacity and the response to stress are linked in C. tepidum, with the RLP playing a major role.

Identifiers

PMID16245053
OpenAlexW2009992061

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.