ArticleThe Journal of membrane biology2005
Pathways for K+ efflux in isolated surface and crypt colonic cells. Activation by calcium.
Article in The Journal of membrane biology, 2005. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
K+ -conductive pathways were evaluated in isolated surface and crypt colonic cells, by measuring (86)Rb efflux. In crypt cells, basal K+ efflux (rate constant: 0.24 +/- 0.044 min(-1), span: 24 +/- 1.3%) was inhibited by 30 mM TEA and 5 mM Ba2+ in an additive way, suggesting the existence of two different conductive pathways. Basal efflux was insensitive to apamin, iberiotoxin, charybdotoxin and clotrimazole. Ionomycin (5 microM) stimulated K+ efflux, increasing the rate constant to 0.65 +/- 0.007 min(-1) and the span to 83 +/- 3.2%. Ionomycin-induced K+ efflux was inhibited by clotrimazole (IC(50) of 25 +/- 0.4 microM) and charybdotoxin (IC(50) of 65 +/- 5.0 nM) and was insensitive to TEA, Ba2+, apamin and iberiotoxin, suggesting that this conductive pathway is related to the Ca2+-activated intermediate-conductance K+ channels (IK(ca)). Absence of extracellular Ca2+ did neither affect basal nor ionomycin-induced K+ efflux. However, intracellular Ca2+ depletion totally inhibited the ionomycin-induced K+ efflux, indicating that the activation of these K+ channels mainly depends on intracellular calcium liberation. K+ efflux was stimulated by intracellular Ca(2+) with an EC(50) of 1.1 +/- 0.04 microM. In surface cells, K+ efflux (rate constant: 0.17 +/- 0.027 min(-1); span: 25 +/- 3.4%) was insensitive to TEA and Ba2+. However, ionomycin induced K+ efflux with characteristics identical to that observed in crypt cells. In conclusion, both surface and crypt cells present IK(Ca) channels but only crypt cells have TEA- and Ba2+-sensitive conductive pathways, which would determine their participation in colonic K+ secretion.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.