Trial reportZeitschrift fur Rheumatologie2005
[The common occurrence of osteoarthritis and osteoporosis and the value of markers of bone turnover].
Trial report in Zeitschrift fur Rheumatologie, 2005. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 8 citations in OpenAlex.
- Osteoporosis, Osteoarthritis, and Subchondral Insufficiency Fracture: Recent Insights.Biomedicines · 2024Review
- [Endoprosthetic treatment of osteoporosis-related coxarthrosis : aspects of safe patient treatment].Der Orthopade · 2014Review
- Dual energy x-ray absorptiometry analysis contributes to the prediction of hip osteoarthritis progression.Arthritis research & therapy · 2009Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveIncreasing bone mineral density (BMD) has been found in several studies in patients with osteoarthritis. Therefore, many clinicians deny the simultaneous occurrence of osteoporosis (OP) and osteoarthritis (OA). Because of our clinical impression however, we suggested that we have to consider a common occurrence. Furthermore, the value of markers of bone turn over with a view to early diagnosis of OP and or as an assessment for bone metabolism in OA is still a matter debate and their clinical use has not been clearly defined in the management of the individual patient.
methodThe BMD of the lumbar spine and the proximal femur of 119 OA patients (83 postmenopausal female patients aged 50-83 and 35 male patients aged 36-86 years) who subsequently required hip or knee replacements, but were otherwise healthy, were measured by dual energy X-ray absorption (DXA), Hologic QDR-2000. We also measured biochemical markers of bone turn over, i. e., CICP, ICTP, DPD, PTH, estrogen, testosterone, bAP, hydroxy vitamin D and the normal blood count.
resultsThere was a high occurrence of a low BMD among the patients. A total of 28.9% of women were affected by OP and 52.9% by osteopoenie. This reflects the normal distribution of OP in the female population. Of the male patients 20% had OP and 38.8% osteopoenie. This is astonishing high. Age proved to be a significant factor in the degree of BMD. An association between disuse osteoporosis and degree of BMD in the OA affected joint could not be proven. The use of the biochemical markers for an earlier diagnosis or to assess bone metabolism in OP and OA was not possible.
conclusionWe can not support the hypotheses that OA prevents OP. Moreover, the occurrence of OP in our study reflected the incidence of OP in the average female and the astonishingly high incidence in the male population; however does not mean that the two conditions are mutually exclusive. We did not find that the biochemical markers of bone turn over could deliver additional information with respect to bone metabolism and an earlier diagnosis of OP.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.