ArticleJournal of bacteriology1992
A new mercury-penicillin V derivative as a probe for ultrastructural localization of penicillin-binding proteins in Escherichia coli.
Article in Journal of bacteriology, 1992. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed, 15 citations in OpenAlex.
- Who's Winning the War? Molecular Mechanisms of Antibiotic Resistance in Helicobacter pylori.Current drug therapy · 2008Article
- Contribution of gentamicin 2'-N-acetyltransferase to the O acetylation of peptidoglycan in Providencia stuartii.Journal of bacteriology · 1995Article
- Localization of penicillin-binding proteins to the splitting system of Staphylococcus aureus septa by using a mercury-penicillin V derivative.Journal of bacteriology · 1995Article
- Analysis of the sodium dodecyl sulfate-stable peptidoglycan autolysins of select gram-negative pathogens by using renaturing polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis.Journal of bacteriology · 1994Article
- Penicillin-binding proteins and bacterial resistance to beta-lactams.Antimicrobial agents and chemotherapy · 1993Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The precise ultrastructural localization of penicillin-binding protein (PBP)-antibiotic complexes in Escherichia coli JM101, JM101 (pBS96), and JM101(pPH116) was investigated by high-resolution electron microscopy. We used mercury-penicillin V (Hg-pen V) as a heavy-metal-labeled, electron-dense probe for accurately localizing PBPs in situ in single bacterial cells grown to exponential growth phase. Biochemical data derived from susceptibility tests and bacteriolysis experiments revealed no significant differences between Hg-pen V and the parent compound, penicillin V, or between strains. Both antibiotics revealed differences in the binding affinities for PBPs of all strains. Deacylation rates for PBPs were slow despite the relatively low binding affinities of antibiotics. Cells bound most of the Hg-pen V added to cultures, and the antibiotic-PBP complex could readily be seen by electron microscopy of unstained whole mounts as distinct, randomly situated electron-dense particles. Fifty to 60% of the antibiotic was retained by cells during processing for conventional embedding so that thin sections could also be examined. These revealed similar electron-dense particles located predominantly on the plasma membrane and less frequently in the cytoplasm. Particles positioned on the plasma membranes were occasionally shown to protrude into the periplasmic space, thereby reflecting the high resolution of the Hg-pen V probe. Moreover, some particles were observed free in the periplasm, suggesting, for the first time, that a proportion of PBPs may not be restricted to the plasma membrane but may be tightly associated with the peptidoglycan for higher efficiency of peptidoglycan assembly. All controls were devoid of the electron-dense particles. The presence of electron-dense particles in cells of the wild-type JM101, demonstrated that our probe could identify PBPs in naturally occurring strains without inducing PBP overproduction.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.