Evidence map›Paper›PMID 16243968›Full record

ArticleProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America2005

Quantitative high-throughput analysis of DNA methylation patterns by base-specific cleavage and mass spectrometry.

Mathias Ehrich, Matthew R Nelson, Patrick Stanssens, Marc Zabeau, Triantafillos Liloglou, George Xinarianos, Charles R Cantor, John K Field, Dirk van den Boom

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2005. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 398 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
398citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

398 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Trial
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. The relationship between childhood trauma, rs1360780 genotypes,European journal of psychotraumatology · 2025
    Article
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Review

338 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Mathias EhrichSEQUENOM, Inc., 3595 John Hopkins Court, San Diego, CA 92121, USA.
Matthew R Nelson
Patrick Stanssens
Marc Zabeau
Triantafillos Liloglou
George Xinarianos
Charles R Cantor
John K Field
Dirk van den Boom

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Methylation is one of the major epigenetic processes pivotal to our understanding of carcinogenesis. It is now widely accepted that there is a relationship between DNA methylation, chromatin structure, and human malignancies. DNA methylation is potentially an important clinical marker in cancer molecular diagnostics. Understanding epigenetic modifications in their biological context involves several aspects of DNA methylation analysis. These aspects include the de novo discovery of differentially methylated genes, the analysis of methylation patterns, and the determination of differences in the degree of methylation. Here we present a previously uncharacterized method for high-throughput DNA methylation analysis that utilizes MALDI-TOF mass spectrometry (MS) analysis of base-specifically cleaved amplification products. We use the IGF2/H19 region to show that a single base-specific cleavage reaction is sufficient to discover methylation sites and to determine methylation ratios within a selected target region. A combination of cleavage reactions enables the complete evaluation of all relevant aspects of DNA methylation, with most CpGs represented in multiple reactions. We successfully applied this technology under high-throughput conditions to quantitatively assess methylation differences between normal and neoplastic lung cancer tissue samples from 48 patients in 47 genes and demonstrate that the quantitative methylation results allow accurate classification of samples according to their histopathology.

Indexed as

DNA MethylationBinding SitesCluster AnalysisDiagnostic Techniques and ProceduresGenomicsHumansLung NeoplasmsNeoplasmsPolymerase Chain ReactionSpectrometry, Mass, Matrix-Assisted Laser Desorption-IonizationSulfiteshydrogen sulfiteSulfites

Identifiers

PMID16243968
PMCPMC1276092

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.