Evidence map›Paper›PMID 16242019›Full record

ArticleBMC developmental biology2005

nfi-I affects behavior and life-span in C. elegans but is not essential for DNA replication or survival.

Elena Lazakovitch, John M Kalb, Reiko Matsumoto, Keiko Hirono, Yuji Kohara, Richard M Gronostajski

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC developmental biology, 2005. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
0.3field-weighted citation impact, top 50% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 11 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Transcriptional regulation of gene expression in C. elegans.WormBook : the online review of C. elegans biology · 2013
    Review
  4. Article
  5. DNA-binding specificity and in vivo targets of Caenorhabditis elegans nuclear factor I.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2009
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Elena LazakovitchDept. of Biochemistry, SUNY at Buffalo, 140 Farber Hall, Buffalo, NY 14214, USA. el29@buffalo.edu
John M Kalb
Reiko Matsumoto
Keiko Hirono
Yuji Kohara
Richard M Gronostajski
University at Buffalo, State University of New York · USNational Institute of Genetics · JPCanisius College · US

Funding

NUCLEAR FACTOR I GENE FAMILY AND DEVELOPMENTR01HD034908 · NICHD · STATE UNIVERSITY OF NEW YORK AT BUFFALO · PI GRONOSTAJSKI, RICHARD M · 1997 to 2000
$201k
NICHD NIH HHS HD34908
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe Nuclear Factor I (one) (NFI) family of transcription/replication factors plays essential roles in mammalian gene expression and development and in adenovirus DNA replication. Because of its role in viral DNA replication NFI has long been suspected to function in host DNA synthesis. Determining the requirement for NFI proteins in mammalian DNA replication is complicated by the presence of 4 NFI genes in mice and humans. Loss of individual NFI genes in mice cause defects in brain, lung and tooth development, but the presence of 4 homologous NFI genes raises the issue of redundant roles for NFI genes in DNA replication. No NFI genes are present in bacteria, fungi or plants. However single NFI genes are present in several simple animals including Drosophila and C. elegans, making it possible to test for a requirement for NFI in multicellular eukaryotic DNA replication and development. Here we assess the functions of the single nfi-1 gene in C. elegans.

resultsC. elegans NFI protein (CeNFI) binds specifically to the same NFI-binding site recognized by vertebrate NFIs. nfi-1 encodes alternatively-spliced, maternally-inherited transcripts that are expressed at the single cell stage, during embryogenesis, and in adult muscles, neurons and gut cells. Worms lacking nfi-1 survive but have defects in movement, pharyngeal pumping and egg-laying and have a reduced life-span. Expression of the muscle gene Ce titin is decreased in nfi-1 mutant worms.

conclusionNFI gene function is not needed for survival in C. elegans and thus NFI is likely not essential for DNA replication in multi-cellular eukaryotes. The multiple defects in motility, egg-laying, pharyngeal pumping, and reduced lifespan indicate that NFI is important for these processes. Reduction in Ce titin expression could affect muscle function in multiple tissues. The phenotype of nfi-1 null worms indicates that NFI functions in multiple developmental and behavioral systems in C. elegans, likely regulating genes that function in motility, egg-laying, pharyngeal pumping and lifespan maintenance.

Indexed as

Behavior, AnimalDNA ReplicationLongevityAlternative SplicingAnimalsCaenorhabditis elegansCaenorhabditis elegans ProteinsGene Expression Regulation, DevelopmentalNFI Transcription FactorsPhenotypeSurvivalCaenorhabditis elegans ProteinsNFI Transcription Factors

Identifiers

PMID16242019
PMCPMC1277823
OpenAlexW2112713014

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.