ArticleAtencion primaria2005
[Assessment of the effectiveness of an instrument to identify health an social problems in an elderly population from a primary health care center].
Article in Atencion primaria, 2005. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- [Clinical validation of 2 morbidity groups in the primary care setting].Atencion primaria · 2020Article
- Common mental disorders in primary health care: differences between Latin American-born and Spanish-born residents in Madrid, Spain.Social psychiatry and psychiatric epidemiology · 2015Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveTo assess the response rate to a multi-dimensional, self administered questionnaire in patients > or =75 years old attending a primary health care center and to establish the prevalences of problems in the following dimensions: socio-economical, cognitive, morbidity, polypharmacy, physical activity, falls, and activities of the daily living.
designCross-sectional descriptive study based on a self-administered questionnaire posted by mail.
settingA primary health care center in Barcelona.
participantsA total of 1299 patients > or =75 years old. MAIN MEASUREMENTS: Social surroundings, activities of the daily living, sensorial problems, morbidity, physical symptoms including sphincter's incontinence, cognitive status, and medication use.
resultsThe response rate was 68% (95% CI, 0.65-0.70). The average age of the women who participated was significantly greater than the one of the men (82.5+/-5.3 vs 81.6+/-5.0, respectively). A significantly greater proportion of women than of men lived single (38.2 vs 10.9%); they had difficulties to maintain its house cosy (15.6 vs 8.8%) and they had difficulties to make ends meet (18.0 vs 13.6%). Globally, there were a greater proportion of women than of men whom they had: medical problems, cognitive problems, depression, and difficulties to carry out activities of the daily living. Overall, subjects that have had difficulties to make ends meet had greater prevalences of problems in all the dimensions of this evaluation. On the other hand, subjects that lived single had lower prevalences of problems in all the dimensions except they had a greater prevalence of depression.
conclusionThe multidimensional evaluation in elderly patients by the postal method is an efficient procedure that allows identifying many socioeconomic and health problems. In addition, it is feasible to identify to most fragile subjects and latter on to carry out preventive and curative interventions on them as well as to make their follow up.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.