Evidence map›Paper›PMID 16237037›Full record

ArticleJournal of bacteriology2005

Chlamydial GroEL autoregulates its own expression through direct interactions with the HrcA repressor protein.

Adam C Wilson, Christine C Wu, John R Yates, Ming Tan

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of bacteriology, 2005. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 23 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
23citing papers in PubMed
2.5field-weighted citation impact, top 12% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

23 citing papers in PubMed, 43 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. A conservedMicrobiology (Reading, England) · 2025
    Article
  5. Insights into the Orchestration of Gene Transcription Regulators inInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2022
    Review
  6. Feeling the Heat: TheBiomolecules · 2021
    Article
  7. Robust Heat Shock Response inFrontiers in microbiology · 2021
    Article
  8. Protein aggregation in bacteria.FEMS microbiology reviews · 2020
    Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Frontiers in microbiology · 2017
    Article
  12. Following the Footsteps of Chlamydial Gene Regulation.Molecular biology and evolution · 2015
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Adam C WilsonDepartment of Microbiology and Molecular Genetics, University of California, Irvine, CA 92697-4025, USA.
Christine C Wu
John R Yates
Ming Tan
Scripps Research Institute · USUniversity of California, Irvine · USUniversity of Colorado Health · US

Funding

The Regulation of gene expression in ChlamydiaR01AI044198 · NIAID · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA-IRVINE · PI TAN, MING · 1999 to 2021
$7.1M
SYNTHESIS AND STRUCTURE OF BIOLOGICAL MACROMOLECULEST32GM007311 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA IRVINE · PI OSBORNE, TIMOTHY F · 1985 to 2004
$1.6M
Molecular mechanisms of gene regulation in ChlamydiaK02AI057563 · NIAID · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA-IRVINE · PI TAN, MING · 2004 to 2008
$474k
Mechanisms of temporal gene regulation in ChlamydiaR56AI044198 · NIAID · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA-IRVINE · PI TAN, MING · 2010 to 2010
$383k
NIAID NIH HHS AI 057563NIAID NIH HHS AI44198NIAID NIH HHS K02 AI057563NIAID NIH HHS R01 AI044198NIAID NIH HHS R56 AI044198NIGMS NIH HHS GMT3207311
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In the pathogenic bacterium Chlamydia trachomatis, a transcriptional repressor, HrcA, regulates the major heat shock operons, dnaK and groE. Cellular stress causes a transient increase in transcription of these heat shock operons through relief of HrcA-mediated repression, but the pathway leading to derepression is unclear. Elevated temperature alone is not sufficient, and it is hypothesized that additional chlamydial factors play a role. We used DNA affinity chromatography to purify proteins that interact with HrcA in vivo and identified a higher-order complex consisting of HrcA, GroEL, and GroES. This endogenous HrcA complex migrated differently than recombinant HrcA, but the complex could be disrupted, releasing native HrcA that resembled recombinant HrcA. In in vitro assays, GroEL increased the ability of HrcA to bind to the CIRCE operator and to repress transcription. Other chlamydial heat shock proteins, including the two additional GroEL paralogs present in all chlamydial species, did not modulate HrcA activity.

Indexed as

Bacterial ProteinsChaperonin 10Chaperonin 60Chlamydia trachomatisChromatography, AffinityDNA-Binding ProteinsElectrophoretic Mobility Shift AssayGene Expression Regulation, BacterialMass SpectrometryOperator Regions, GeneticProtein BindingRepressor ProteinsTranscription, GeneticBacterial ProteinsChaperonin 10Chaperonin 60DNA-Binding ProteinsRepressor Proteins

Identifiers

PMID16237037
PMCPMC1272993
OpenAlexW2100291394

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.