Evidence map›Paper›PMID 16235396›Full record

SynthesisThe Cochrane database of systematic reviews2005

Spermicide used alone for contraception.

D A Grimes, L Lopez, E G Raymond, V Halpern, K Nanda, K F Schulz

Abstract readSystematic Review
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Synthesis in The Cochrane database of systematic reviews, 2005. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 6 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Review
  4. Contraception in Medically Complex Adolescents and Young Adults.Open access journal of contraception · 2024
    Article
  5. Non-Hormonal Contraception.Journal of clinical medicine · 2023
    Review
  6. New Contraception Update - Annovera, Phexxi, Slynd, and Twirla.Current obstetrics and gynecology reports · 2022
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

D A GrimesFamily Health International, P. O. Box 13950, Research Triangle Park, Durham, North Carolina 27709, USA. dgrimes@fhi.org
L Lopez
E G Raymond
V Halpern
K Nanda
K F Schulz
Family Health International 360 · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundSpermicides have been used as contraceptives for thousands of years. Despite this long use, only recently have studies examined the comparative efficacy and acceptability of these vaginal medications. Spermicides contain an active ingredient (most commonly nonoxynol-9) and a formulation used to disperse the product, such as foam or vaginal suppository.

objectivesThis review examined all known randomized controlled trials of a spermicide used alone for contraception. SEARCH STRATEGY: We searched the following computerized databases from inception to July 2004 for randomized controlled trials of spermicides for contraception: Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL), MEDLINE, POPLINE, LILACS, and EMBASE. We examined the reference list of each trial found as well as that of review articles and textbook chapters. SELECTION CRITERIA: We included any trial of a commercial product used alone for contraception. Each included trial must have provided sufficient information to determine pregnancy rates. We located reports from 14 trials. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: Two reviewers independently extracted information from the trials identified. We did not conduct a meta-analysis, since most trials had large losses to follow-up. We entered the data into tables and presented the results descriptively. MAIN

resultsIn the largest trial to date, the gel (Advantage S) containing the lowest dose of nonoxynol-9 (52.5 mg) was significantly less effective in preventing pregnancy than were gels with higher doses of the same agent (100 mg and 150 mg). Probabilities of pregnancy by six months were 22% for the 52.5 mg gel, 16% for the 100 mg dose, and 14% for the 150 mg dose. In the same trial, the three different vehicles with 100 mg of nonoxynol-9 had similar efficacy. Interpretation of these figures is limited, since 39% of participants discontinued the method or were lost from the trial. Few important differences in efficacy emerged in other trials. AUTHORS'

conclusionsThe probability of pregnancy varied widely in reported trials. A gel containing nonoxynol-9 52.5 mg was inferior to two other products tested in the largest trial. Aside from this finding, personal characteristics and behavior of users may be more important than characteristics of the spermicide products in determining the probability of pregnancy. Gel was liked more than the film or vaginal suppository in the largest trial. Spermicide trials have the dual challenges of difficult recruitment and high discontinuation rates; the latter threatens trial validity.

Indexed as

ContraceptionHumansRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicSpermatocidal AgentsSpermatocidal Agents

Identifiers

PMID16235396
OpenAlexW4246792686

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.