SynthesisThe Cochrane database of systematic reviews2005
Transverse verses midline incisions for abdominal surgery.
Synthesis in The Cochrane database of systematic reviews, 2005. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 85 papers, 16 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
85 citing papers in PubMed, 16 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 204 citations in OpenAlex.
- The Role of Surgical Techniques in Reducing Postoperative Pain in Abdominal Surgery: Evidence From the PROSPECT Systematic Reviews.World journal of surgery · 2025Pooled it
- Risk factors for incisional hernia after open abdominal aortic aneurysm repair: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Hernia : the journal of hernias and abdominal wall surgery · 2024Pooled it
- Surgical site infection following cesarean section and its predictors in Ethiopia: A systematic review and meta-analysis.PloS one · 2024Pooled it
- An evidence map and synthesis review with meta-analysis on the risk of incisional hernia in colorectal surgery with standard closure.Hernia : the journal of hernias and abdominal wall surgery · 2022Pooled it
- Laparoscopic versus Open Transverse-Incision Approach for Right Hemicolectomy: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.Medicina (Kaunas, Lithuania) · 2021Pooled it
- Incisional hernia formation in hepatobiliary surgery using transverse and hybrid incisions: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Annals of the Royal College of Surgeons of England · 2020Pooled it
- Closure methods for laparotomy incisions for preventing incisional hernias and other wound complications.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2017Pooled it
- Enhanced recovery program versus traditional care after hepatectomy: A meta-analysis.Medicine · 2017Pooled it
- Noninvasive positive pressure ventilation for acute respiratory failure following upper abdominal surgery.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2015Pooled it
- Pooled it
- European Hernia Society guidelines on the closure of abdominal wall incisions.Hernia : the journal of hernias and abdominal wall surgery · 2015Guideline
- Transverse skin crease versus vertical midline incision versus laparoscopy for right hemicolectomy: a systematic review--current status of right hemicolectomy.BioMed research international · 2014Pooled it
- Peritoneal closure versus no peritoneal closure for patients undergoing non-obstetric abdominal operations.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2013Pooled it
- A comparison of clinical officers with medical doctors on outcomes of caesarean section in the developing world: meta-analysis of controlled studies.BMJ (Clinical research ed.) · 2011Pooled it
- Pooled it
- Open surgical procedures for incisional hernias.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2008Pooled it
- The association between the cutaneous sensory block area, the surgical incision's location, and the block's analgesic efficacy: a post hoc sensitivity analysis of data from a controlled randomised multicentre trial.Surgical endoscopy · 2025Trial
- Randomized Trial of Transverse vs Vertical Extraction Site Incision After Robotic Radical Prostatectomy.The Journal of urology · 2024Trial
- Open new simplified totally extraperitoneal (ONSTEP) versus Lichtenstein repair for primary inguinal hernias.Annals of the Royal College of Surgeons of England · 2021Trial
- Short and long-term outcomes of a randomised controlled trial of vertical periumbilical wound versus transverse left iliac fossa wound for specimen retrieval in laparoscopic anterior resections.Surgical endoscopy · 2015Trial
25 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThe choice of surgical incision in the abdomen is determined by access for surgery. It has been suggested that utilising a transverse or oblique rather than a midline incision may influence other parameters such as recovery and complication rates. However, there is little consensus in the literature as to whether a particular incision confers any advantage.
objectivesTo determine whether a midline incision or a transverse incision (including oblique incision) confers any recovery advantage to the patient. SEARCH STRATEGY: Search terms included randomised trials containing combinations of the following: 'abdominal', 'incisions', 'horizontal', 'transverse', 'vertical', 'midline', and 'laparotomy'. SELECTION CRITERIA: All prospective randomised trials comparing midline with transverse incisions for abdominal surgery were included. Caesarian sections were excluded. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: Two review authors assessed the methodological quality of potentially eligible trials and independently extracted data from the included trials. A wide range of outcome measures was considered. MAIN
resultsDue to differences in the method of assessment, the variability of data and the heterogeneity of the participant groups it was difficult to pool some of the outcome data. Despite these limitations, and potentially significant biases related to methodological quality, there was evidence to suggest that a transverse or oblique incision may be less painful and have less impact on pulmonary function than a midline incision, particularly in the early postoperative period. However, there was no difference seen in early or late postoperative complications between a transverse or oblique and a midline incision and recovery times were similar. AUTHORS'
conclusionsBoth analgesia use and pulmonary compromise may be reduced with a transverse or oblique incision but this does not seem to be significant clinically as complication rates and recovery times are the same as with midline incision. The methodological and clinical diversity and the potential for bias in the included studies also mean that the results in favour of a transverse or oblique incision, particularly with regard to analgesic use, should be treated with caution. The optimal incision for abdominal surgery still remains the preference of the surgeon.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.