Evidence map›Paper›PMID 16235388›Full record

SynthesisThe Cochrane database of systematic reviews2005

Surgery for traumatic optic neuropathy.

P Yu-Wai-Man, P G Griffiths

Abstract readSystematic Review
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Synthesis in The Cochrane database of systematic reviews, 2005. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 38 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
38citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

38 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 55 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Surgery for traumatic optic neuropathy.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2013
    Pooled it
  3. Steroids for traumatic optic neuropathy.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2013
    Pooled it
  4. Trial
  5. Traumatic optic neuropathy treatment trial (TONTT): open label, phase 3, multicenter, semi-experimental trial.Graefe's archive for clinical and experimental ophthalmology = Albrecht von Graefes Archiv fur klinische und experimentelle Ophthalmologie · 2018
    Trial
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Hemorrhage in Onodi Cell Leading to Traumatic Optic Neuropathy.Craniomaxillofacial trauma & reconstruction · 2021
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Management of an Unusual Orbitocranial Penetrating Injury.Case reports in ophthalmological medicine · 2020
    Article
  15. Facial Fracture Patterns Associated with Traumatic Optic Neuropathy.Craniomaxillofacial trauma & reconstruction · 2019
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Traumatic Optic Neuropathy.Korean journal of neurotrauma · 2018
    Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Indirect traumatic optic neuropathy.Military Medical Research · 2016
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

P Yu-Wai-ManRoyal Victoria Infirmary, Department of Ophthalmology, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK NE1 4LP. P.Y.S.Y.Yu-Wai-Man@ncl.ac.uk
P G Griffiths
Royal Victoria Infirmary · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundTraumatic optic neuropathy (TON) is an important cause of severe visual loss following blunt or penetrating head trauma. Following the initial insult optic nerve swelling within the optic nerve canal or compression by bone fragments are thought to result in secondary retinal ganglion cell loss. Optic nerve decompression with steroids or surgical interventions or both have therefore been advocated to improve visual prognosis in TON.

objectivesThe aim of this review was to examine the effects and safety of surgical interventions in the management of TON. SEARCH STRATEGY: We searched the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL) (which contains the Cochrane Eyes and Vision Group Trials Register) on The Cochrane Library (Issue 3, 2005), MEDLINE (1966 to August 2005), EMBASE (1980 to 2005 wk 31), NRR 2005 Issue 3, LILACS (September 2004) and the reference lists of other reviews and book chapters on TON. We also contacted researchers in the field. There were no date or language restrictions in the electronic searches for trials. SELECTION CRITERIA: We planned to include only randomised controlled trials of TON in which any form of surgical intervention either on its own or in combination with steroids was compared to steroids alone or no treatment. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: Two authors independently assessed the titles and abstracts identified from the search strategy. No studies were found that met our inclusion criteria and therefore none were included for analysis. MAIN

resultsNo studies were found that met our inclusion criteria. AUTHORS'

conclusionsThe current body of evidence consists mostly of small, retrospective case series. Given the wide range of surgical interventions used in TON it is very difficult to compare these studies, even qualitatively. However, there is a relatively high rate of spontaneous visual recovery and no evidence that surgical decompression of the optic nerve provides any additional benefit. On the other hand surgery carries a definite risk of complications such as postoperative cerebrospinal fluid leak and meningitis. The decision to proceed with surgery in TON therefore remains controversial and each case needs to be assessed on its own merits. Although there is an urgent need for an adequately powered, randomised controlled trial of surgical intervention in TON, this will prove a difficult endeavour.

Indexed as

HumansOptic Nerve Injuries

Identifiers

PMID16235388
OpenAlexW4245799437

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.