Evidence map›Paper›PMID 16235386›Full record

SynthesisThe Cochrane database of systematic reviews2005

Wound cleansing for pressure ulcers.

Z E H Moore, S Cowman

Abstract readMeta-AnalysisSystematic Review
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Synthesis in The Cochrane database of systematic reviews, 2005. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed, 4 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 18 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Interventions for treating leg ulcers in people with sickle cell disease.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2021
    Pooled it
  2. Autologous platelet-rich plasma for treating chronic wounds.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2016
    Pooled it
  3. Repositioning for treating pressure ulcers.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2015
    Pooled it
  4. Interventions for treating leg ulcers in people with sickle cell disease.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2014
    Pooled it
  5. Review
  6. Evidence-based treatment of chronic leg ulcers.Deutsches Arzteblatt international · 2011
    Review
  7. Management of chronic pressure ulcers: an evidence-based analysis.Ontario health technology assessment series · 2009
    Article
  8. Pressure ulcers: Current understanding and newer modalities of treatment.Indian journal of plastic surgery : official publication of the Association of Plastic Surgeons of India
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Z E H MooreRoyal College of Surgeons in Ireland, Faculty of Nursing & Midwifery, 123 St Stephens Green, Dublin, Ireland, Dublin 15. zmoore@rcsi.ie
S Cowman
Royal College of Surgeons in Ireland · IE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPressure ulcers (also called pressure sores, bed sores and decubitus ulcers) are areas of tissue damage that occur in the very old, malnourished or acutely ill, who cannot reposition themselves. Pressure ulcers impose a significant financial burden on health care systems and negatively affect quality of life. Wound cleansing is considered an important component of pressure ulcer care.

objectivesThis systematic review seeks to answer the following question:What is the effect of wound cleansing solutions and wound cleansing techniques on the rate of healing of pressure ulcers? SEARCH STRATEGY: We searched the Specialised Trials Register of the Cochrane Wounds Group (up to August 2005), and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (The Cochrane Library Issue 3, 2005). We searched bibliographies of relevant publications retrieved. We contacted drug companies and experts in the field to identify studies missed by the primary search. SELECTION CRITERIA: Randomised controlled trials (RCTs) comparing wound cleansing with no wound cleansing, or different wound cleansing solutions, or different cleansing techniques, were eligible for inclusion if they reported an objective measure of pressure ulcer healing. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: Two authors extracted data independently and resolved disagreements through discussion and reference to the Cochrane Wounds Group editorial base. A structured narrative summary of the included studies was conducted. For dichotomous outcomes, relative risk (RR), plus 95% confidence intervals (CI) were calculated; for continuous outcomes, weighted mean difference (WMD), plus 95% CI were calculated. Meta analysis was not conducted, because of the small number of diverse RCTs identified. MAIN

resultsNo studies compared cleansing with no cleansing. Two studies compared different wound cleansing solutions: a statistically significant improvement in Pressure Sore Status Tool scores occurred for wounds cleansed with saline spray containing Aloe vera, silver chloride and decyl glucoside (Vulnopur) compared to isotonic saline (P value = 0.025), but no statistically significant change in healing was seen when water was compared to saline (RR 3.00, 95% CI 0.21, 41.89). One study compared cleansing techniques, but no statistically significant change in healing was seen for ulcers cleansed with, or without, a whirlpool (RR 2.10, 95% CI 0.93 to 4.76). AUTHORS'

conclusionsWe identified only three studies addressing cleansing of pressure ulcers. One noted a statistically significant improvement in pressure ulcer healing for wounds cleansed with saline spray containing Aloe vera, silver chloride and decyl glucoside (Vulnopur) when compared with isotonic saline solution. Overall, there is no good trial evidence to support use of any particular wound cleansing solution or technique for pressure ulcers.

Indexed as

Wound HealingHumansPressure UlcerRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicSkin CareSodium ChlorideTherapeutic IrrigationSodium Chloride

Identifiers

PMID16235386
OpenAlexW4249687610

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.