Evidence map›Paper›PMID 16235378›Full record

SynthesisThe Cochrane database of systematic reviews2005

Protein substitute for children and adults with phenylketonuria.

P Rutherford, V J Poustie

Abstract readSystematic Review
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Synthesis in The Cochrane database of systematic reviews, 2005. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 13 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Protein substitute for children and adults with phenylketonuria.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2015
    Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Nutritional issues in treating phenylketonuria.Journal of inherited metabolic disease · 2010
    Review
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

P RutherfordRoyal Liverpool Children's Hospital NHS Trust, Department of Nutrition and Dietetics, Eaton Road, Liverpool, Merseyside, UK L12 2AP. Tricia.Rutherford@rlch-tr.nhs.nwest.uk
V J Poustie
Liverpool Community Health NHS Trust · GBUniversity of Liverpool · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPhenylketonuria is an inherited disease characterised by an absence or deficiency of the enzyme phenylalanine hydroxylase. The aim of treatment is to lower blood phenylalanine concentrations to prevent developmental delay. Current treatment is based on a low phenylalanine diet in combination with a protein substitute (mixtures of amino acids free from or low in phenylalanine). Guidance regarding the dosage and distribution of this protein substitute, over a 24-hour period, is unclear and there is variation in recommendation between treatment centres.

objectivesTo assess in children and adults with phenylketonuria, who are adhering to a low phenylalanine diet, the benefits and adverse effects of protein substitute, its dosage and distribution of dose. SEARCH STRATEGY: We searched the Cochrane Cystic Fibrosis and Genetic Disorders Group Trials Register which comprises of references identified from comprehensive electronic database searches and handsearches of relevant journals and abstract books of conference proceedings. We also contacted manufacturers of the phenylalanine-free and low phenylalanine protein substitutes for any data from published and unpublished randomised controlled trials. Date of the most recent search of the Group's Trials Register: August 2005. SELECTION CRITERIA: All randomised or quasi-randomised controlled trials comparing: any dose of protein substitute with no protein substitute; an alternative dosage; or the same dose, but given as frequent small doses throughout the day compared with the same total daily dose given as larger boluses less frequently. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: Both authors independently extracted data and assessed trial quality. MAIN

resultsThe searches identified 20 trials, of which one, including a total of 28 participants, was eligible for inclusion in the review. This was a two-phase trial, with only phase one being a randomised controlled trial. As data from both phases were combined in the analysis presented in the published paper, we are currently unable to include any data from the randomised controlled trial in the analysis of this review. AUTHORS'

conclusionsNo conclusions could be made about the short- or long-term use of protein substitute in phenylketonuria due to the lack of adequate trial data. A randomised controlled trial is needed to investigate the use of protein substitute in phenylketonuria. Until further evidence is available current practice in the use of protein substitute should continue to be observed and monitored with care.

Indexed as

Food, FormulatedAdultChildDietary ProteinsHumansPhenylalaninePhenylalanine HydroxylasePhenylketonuriasRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicDietary ProteinsPhenylalaninePhenylalanine Hydroxylase

Identifiers

PMID16235378
OpenAlexW2150971110

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.