Evidence map›Paper›PMID 16235372›Full record

SynthesisThe Cochrane database of systematic reviews2005

Laxatives for the treatment of hemorrhoids.

P Alonso-Coello, G Guyatt, D Heels-Ansdell, J F Johanson, M Lopez-Yarto, E Mills, Q Zhou

Registry-linked trialOpen access · greenAbstract readMeta-AnalysisSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in The Cochrane database of systematic reviews, 2005. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT06535269 (Prospective Randomized Study on Postoperative Pain in the Surgical Treatment of Hemorrhoids Through Conventional Hemorrhoidectomy With a Monopolar Electric Scalpel or Bipolar Energy With Caiman®), which is not on this map. Cited by 27 papers, 6 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
27citing papers in PubMed, 6 pooled it
2.8field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT06535269 narecruitingnot on this mapstarted 2022, after this paper: background citation

Prospective Randomized Study on Postoperative Pain in the Surgical Treatment of Hemorrhoids Through Conventional Hemorrhoidectomy With a Monopolar Electric Scalpel or Bipolar Energy With Caiman® (Aesculap®)

TypeinterventionalSponsorCorporacion Parc TauliRan2022 to 2025Enrolled27ConditionsHemorrhoid Pain, HemorrhoidectomyArmsMonopolar Hemorroidecotmy, Caiman Hemorroidectomy
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

27 citing papers in PubMed, 6 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 137 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Guideline
  2. Anorectal emergencies: WSES-AAST guidelines.World journal of emergency surgery : WJES · 2021
    Pooled it
  3. Interventions for preventing postpartum constipation.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2020
    Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Interventions for preventing postpartum constipation.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2015
    Pooled it
  6. Pooled it
  7. Trial
  8. Trial
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Endovascular rectal artery embolisation (RAE) for symptomatic haemorrhoids.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2024
    Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Haemorrhoids: an update on management.Therapeutic advances in chronic disease · 2017
    Review
  20. [Proctology for internists].Der Internist · 2017
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 7 institutions in 4 countries.

P Alonso-CoelloHospital de la Santa Creu i Sant Pau, Iberoamerican Cochrane Centre, C/ Sant Antoni M Claret, 171, Barcelona, Spain 08041. pablotartanedo@yahoo.es
G Guyatt
D Heels-Ansdell
J F Johanson
M Lopez-Yarto
E Mills
Q Zhou
Canadian College of Naturopathic Medicine · CAHealth Sciences Centre · CAHospital de Sant Pau · ESHospital Universitario Dexeus · ESIllinois College · USMcMaster University · CASichuan University · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundSymptomatic hemorrhoids are a common medical condition, which increase in prevalence in women during pregnancy and postpartum. Although the evidence appears to be inconclusive, narrative reviews and clinical practice guidelines recommend the use of laxatives (and fiber) for the treatment of hemorrhoids and relief of symptoms. This is due to their safety and low cost.

objectivesTo evaluate the impact of laxatives on a wide range of symptoms in people with symptomatic hemorrhoids. SEARCH STRATEGY: We searched the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL) (The Cochrane Library Issue 2, 2005), MEDLINE (1966 to 2005), EMBASE (1980 to 2005), CINAHL (1982 to 2005), BIOSIS, and AMED (Allied and Alternative Medicine Database), for eligible trials (including conference proceedings). We sought missing and additional information from authors, industry, and experts in the field. SELECTION CRITERIA: We selected all published and unpublished randomised controlled trials that compared any type of laxative to placebo or no therapy in any patient population. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: Two authors independently screened studies for inclusion and retrieved all potentially relevant studies. Data were extracted from studies that met our selection criteria on study population, intervention used, pre-specified outcomes, and methodology. We extracted methodological information for the assessment of internal validity: existence and method of generation of the randomization schedule, and method of allocation concealment; blinding of caregivers and outcomes assessors; numbers of and reasons for participants lost to follow up; and use of validated outcome measures. MAIN

resultsSeven randomised trials enrolling a total of 378 participants to fiber or a non-fiber control were identified. Meta-analyses using random-effects models showed that laxatives in the form of fiber had a beneficial effect in the treatment of symptomatic hemorrhoids. The risk of not improving hemorrhoids and having persisting symptoms decreased by 53% in the fiber group (risk reduction (RR) 0.47, 95% CI 0.32 to 0.68). These results are compatible with large treatment effects regarding prolapse, pain, itching, although the pooled analyses showed a tendency toward no-effect for these parametres. The effect on bleeding showed a significant difference in favour of the fiber (RR 0.50, 95% CI 0.28 to 0.89). Studies including data on multiple follow ups (usually after six weeks and three months) showed consistent results over time. However, we have to stress two possible limitations of this review: the risk of publication bias, and only moderate study quality. AUTHORS'

conclusionsThe use of fiber shows a consistent beneficial effect for relieving overall symptoms and bleeding in the treatment of symptomatic hemorrhoids.

Indexed as

CatharticsDietary FiberHemorrhoidsHumansPruritusRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicCatharticsDietary Fiber

Identifiers

PMID16235372
PMCPMC9036624
OpenAlexW1941715342

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.