Evidence map›Paper›PMID 16235369›Full record

SynthesisThe Cochrane database of systematic reviews2005

Local anesthetic sympathetic blockade for complex regional pain syndrome.

M S Cepeda, D B Carr, J Lau

Abstract readSystematic Review
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Synthesis in The Cochrane database of systematic reviews, 2005. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed, 4 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 56 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Local anaesthetic sympathetic blockade for complex regional pain syndrome.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2016
    Pooled it
  3. Guideline
  4. Pooled it
  5. Trial
  6. Complex regional pain syndrome type I: efficacy of stellate ganglion blockade.Journal of orthopaedics and traumatology : official journal of the Italian Society of Orthopaedics and Traumatology · 2009
    Trial
  7. Trial
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Pain in cancer survivors.Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology · 2014
    Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Endoscopic thoracic sympathectomy for posttraumatic complex regional pain syndrome.European journal of trauma and emergency surgery : official publication of the European Trauma Society · 2011
    Article
  15. Review
  16. Algodystrophy: recent insight into the pathogenic framework.Clinical cases in mineral and bone metabolism : the official journal of the Italian Society of Osteoporosis, Mineral Metabolism, and Skeletal Diseases
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 2 institutions in 3 countries.

M S CepedaJaveriana University School of Medicine, Department of Anesthesia, Cra 4-70-69, Bogota, Colombia. scepeda@javeriana.edu.co
D B Carr
J Lau
Tufts Medical Center · USJohnson & Johnson (Sweden) · SE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundLocal anesthetic blockade of the sympathetic chain is widely used to treat reflex sympathetic dystrophy (RSD) and causalgia. These two pain syndromes are now conceptualized as variants of a single entity: complex regional pain syndrome (CRPS). A recent meta-analysis of the topic has been published. However, this study only evaluated studies in English language and therefore it could have overlooked some randomized controlled trials.

objectivesThis systematic review had three objectives: to determine the likelihood of pain alleviation after sympathetic blockade with local anesthetics in the patient with CRPS; to assess how long any benefit persists; and to evaluate the incidence of adverse effects of the procedure. SEARCH STRATEGY: We searched the Cochrane Pain, Palliative and Supportive Care Register, the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, MEDLINE, EMBASE, LILACS, and conference abstracts of the World Congresses of the International Association for the Study of Pain. Bibliographies from retrieved articles were also searched for additional studies. SELECTION CRITERIA: We considered for inclusion randomized controlled trials that evaluated the effect of sympathetic blockade with local anesthetics in children or in adult patients to treat RSD, causalgia, or CRPS. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: The outcomes of interest were the number of patients who obtained at least 50% of pain relief shortly after sympathetic blockade (30 minutes to 2 hours) and 48 hours or later. We also assessed the presence of adverse effects in each treatment arm. A random effects model was used to combine the studies. MAIN

resultsTwo small randomized double blind cross over studies that evaluated 23 subjects were found. The combined effect of the two trials produced a relative risk (RR) to achieve at least 50% of pain relief 30 minutes to 2 hours after the sympathetic blockade of 1.17 (95% CI 0.80-1.72). It was not possible to determine the effect of sympathetic blockade on long-term pain relief because the authors of the two studies evaluated different outcomes. AUTHORS'

conclusionsThis systematic review revealed the scarcity of published evidence to support the use of local anesthetic sympathetic blockade as the 'gold standard' treatment for CRPS. The two randomized studies that met inclusion criteria had very small sample sizes, therefore, no conclusion concerning the effectiveness of this procedure could be drawn. There is a need to conduct randomized controlled trials to address the value of sympathetic blockade with local anesthetic for the treatment of CRPS.

Indexed as

Anesthetics, LocalAdultAutonomic Nerve BlockCausalgiaChildComplex Regional Pain SyndromesHumansRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicReflex Sympathetic DystrophyAnesthetics, Local

Identifiers

PMID16235369
OpenAlexW4231047922

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.